Literature DB >> 12501721

Seven ways to plagiarize: handling real allegations of research misconduct.

Michael C Loui1.   

Abstract

As the research integrity officer at my university for two years, I handled eight allegations of plagiarism. These eight cases show that initial appearances can be mistaken, that policies for handling allegations of research misconduct cannot cover every contingency, and that many cases can be resolved collegially without resort to formal procedures.

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Legal Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12501721     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-002-0005-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  3 in total

1.  New common federal definition of research misconduct in the United States.

Authors:  S J Bird; A K Dustira
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  The American experience: lessons learned.

Authors:  L J Rhoades
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Scientific misconduct. Michigan gets an expensive lesson.

Authors:  C Anderson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-10-01       Impact factor: 47.728

  3 in total
  6 in total

1.  Exploring the role of the research integrity officer. Commentary on 'Seven ways to plagiarize: handling real allegations of research misconduct'.

Authors:  Lisa N Geller
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Self-plagiarism and dual and redundant publications: what is the problem? Commentary on 'Seven ways to plagiarize: handling real allegations of research misconduct'.

Authors:  Stephanie J Bird
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 3.  Educational technologies and the teaching of ethics in science and engineering.

Authors:  Michael C Loui
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Plagiarism: words and ideas.

Authors:  Mathieu Bouville
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Assessing the preparedness of research integrity officers (RIOs) to appropriately handle possible research misconduct cases.

Authors:  Arthur J Bonito; Sandra L Titus; David E Wright
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Self-plagiarism in academic publishing: the anatomy of a misnomer.

Authors:  Liviu Andreescu
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.525

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.