Literature DB >> 26637339

Lexical factors in conceptual processes: The relationship between semantic representations and their corresponding phonological and orthographic lexical forms.

Orna Peleg1,2, Lee Edelist3, Zohar Eviatar4, Dafna Bergerbest5.   

Abstract

To examine phonological and orthographic effects on semantic processing, the present study utilized a semantic task with nonverbal stimuli. In Experiment 1, Hebrew speakers were asked to decide whether 2 pictorial targets are semantically related or not. In Experiment 2, Hebrew speakers and non-Hebrew speakers were asked to rate the semantic relatedness of the same targets on a 5-point scale. Experiment 3 was identical to the first experiment except that the 2 pictures were presented simultaneously rather than sequentially. In all experiments, we compared responses to semantically unrelated pairs in 2 conditions: In the ambiguous condition, each pair represented 2 distinct meanings of an ambiguous Hebrew word. In the unambiguous condition, the first picture was replaced with an unambiguous control. To disentangle phonological and orthographic effects, three types of Hebrew ambiguous words were used: homonyms, homophones, and homographs. Ambiguous pairs were more difficult to be judged as semantically unrelated in comparison to their unambiguous controls. Moreover, while non-Hebrew speakers did not distinguish between the 2 lexical conditions, Hebrew speakers rated ambiguous pairs as significantly more related than their unambiguous controls. Importantly, in general, the ambiguity effect was stronger for homonyms, where both lexical forms are shared, than for either homophones or homographs, which are only phonologically or orthographically related. Thus, consistent with interactive "triangle" models, the results suggest that (a) conceptual-semantic representations automatically activate both their corresponding phonological and orthographic lexical forms, and (b) these lexical forms, once activated, may in turn affect semantic-conceptual processes via feedback connections.

Keywords:  Concepts; Lexical processing; Object recognition; Semantic memory; Word production

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26637339     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-015-0576-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  30 in total

Review 1.  A theory of lexical access in speech production.

Authors:  W J Levelt; A Roelofs; A S Meyer
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production.

Authors:  Ezequiel Morsella; Michele Miozzo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Exploring the activation of semantic and phonological codes during speech planning with event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Jörg D Jescheniak; Herbert Schriefers; Merrill F Garrett; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes.

Authors:  Michael W Harm; Mark S Seidenberg
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  The representation of homophones: evidence from the distractor-frequency effect.

Authors:  Michele Miozzo; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Early activation of object names in visual search.

Authors:  Antje S Meyer; Eva Belke; Anna L Telling; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08

7.  The role of orthography in speech production revisited.

Authors:  F-X Alario; Laetitia Perre; Caroline Castel; Johannes C Ziegler
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2006-03-20

8.  Semantic asymmetries are modulated by phonological asymmetries: evidence from the disambiguation of homophonic versus heterophonic homographs.

Authors:  Orna Peleg; Zohar Eviatar
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  When deaf signers read English: do written words activate their sign translations?

Authors:  Jill P Morford; Erin Wilkinson; Agnes Villwock; Pilar Piñar; Judith F Kroll
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-12-08

10.  Watching the Word Go by: On the Time-course of Component Processes in Visual Word Recognition.

Authors:  Jonathan Grainger; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2009-01-01
View more
  1 in total

1.  Small Semantic Networks in Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder Without Intellectual Impairment: A Verbal Fluency Approach.

Authors:  Felicitas Ehlen; Stefan Roepke; Fabian Klostermann; Irina Baskow; Pia Geise; Cyril Belica; Hannes Ole Tiedt; Behnoush Behnia
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2020-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.