Literature DB >> 14620353

A reversed word length effect in coordinating the preparation and articulation of words in speaking.

Zenzi M Griffin1.   

Abstract

Speakers tend to prepare their nouns immediately before saying them, rather than preparing them further in advance. To test the limits of this last-second preparation, speakers were asked to name object pairs without pausing between names. There was not enough time to prepare the second name while articulating the first, so the speakers' delay in starting to say the first name was based on the amount of time available to prepare the second name during speech. Before speaking, they spent more time preparing a second name (e.g., carrot) when the first name was monosyllabic (e.g., wig) rather than multisyllabic (e.g., windmill). When additional words intervened between names, the length of the first name became less important and speech began earlier. Preparation differences were reflected in speech latencies, durations, and eye movements. The results suggest that speakers are sensitive to the length of prepared words and the time needed for preparing subsequent words. They can use this information to increase fluency while minimizing word buffering.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14620353      PMCID: PMC5533605          DOI: 10.3758/bf03196521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  8 in total

1.  High level processing scope in spoken sentence production.

Authors:  M Smith; L Wheeldon
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-12-17

2.  Synchronizing visual and language processing: an effect of object name length on eye movements.

Authors:  G J Zelinsky; G L Murphy
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-03

3.  What the eyes say about speaking.

Authors:  Z M Griffin; K Bock
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-07

4.  Phonological priming effects on speech onset latencies and viewing times in object naming.

Authors:  A S Meyer; F F van der Meulen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-06

5.  Gaze durations during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding.

Authors:  Z M Griffin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2001-11

6.  Meaning in visual search.

Authors:  M C Potter
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Viewing and naming objects: eye movements during noun phrase production.

Authors:  A S Meyer; A M Sleiderink; W J Levelt
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-05

8.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03
  8 in total
  15 in total

1.  Planning in sentence production: evidence for the phrase as a default planning scope.

Authors:  Randi C Martin; Jason E Crowther; Meredith Knight; Franklin P Tamborello; Chin-Lung Yang
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-05-23

2.  The effects of utterance timing and stimulation of left prefrontal cortex on the production of referential expressions.

Authors:  Jennifer E Arnold; Nazbanou Nozari
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-01-12

Review 3.  Observing the what and when of language production for different age groups by monitoring speakers' eye movements.

Authors:  Zenzi M Griffin; Daniel H Spieler
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Prosodic Planning: Effects of Phrasal Length and Complexity on Pause Duration.

Authors:  Jelena Krivokapi
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2007-04

5.  Redundancy and reduction: speakers manage syntactic information density.

Authors:  T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Processes of incremental message planning during conversation.

Authors:  Sarah Brown-Schmidt; Agnieszka E Konopka
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06

7.  Ways of looking ahead: hierarchical planning in language production.

Authors:  Eun-Kyung Lee; Sarah Brown-Schmidt; Duane G Watson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-09-14

8.  Spoken verb processing in Spanish: An analysis using a new online resource.

Authors:  Semilla M Rivera; Elizabeth A Bates; Araceli Orozco-Figueroa; Nicole Y Y Wicha
Journal:  Appl Psycholinguist       Date:  2010-01

9.  When phonological neighborhood density both facilitates and impedes: Age of acquisition and name agreement interact with phonological neighborhood during word production.

Authors:  Hossein Karimi; Michele Diaz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-08

10.  Incremental Phonological Encoding during Unscripted Sentence Production.

Authors:  T Florian Jaeger; Katrina Furth; Caitlin Hilliard
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.