Literature DB >> 24303453

Current concepts on spinal arthrodesis in degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine.

Marios G Lykissas1, Alexander Aichmair.   

Abstract

Back pain is a common chronic disorder that represents a large burden for the health care system. There is a broad spectrum of available treatment options for patients suffering from chronic lower back pain in the setting of degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine, including both conservative and operative approaches. Lumbar arthrodesis techniques can be divided into sub-categories based on the part of the vertebral column that is addressed (anterior vs posterior). Furthermore, one has to differentiate between approaches aiming at a solid fusion in contrast to motion-sparing techniques with the proposed advantage of a reduced risk of developing adjacent disc disease. However, the field of application and long-term outcomes of these novel motion-preserving surgical techniques, including facet arthroplasty, nucleus replacement, and lumbar disc arthroplasty, need to be more precisely evaluated in long-term prospective studies. Innovative surgical treatment strategies involving minimally invasive techniques, such as lateral lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, as well as percutaneous implantation of transpedicular or transfacet screws, have been established with the reported advantages of reduced tissue invasiveness, decreased collateral damage, reduced blood loss, and decreased risk of infection. The aim of this study was to review well-established procedures for lumbar spinal fusion with the main focus on current concepts on spinal arthrodesis and motion-sparing techniques in degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intrebody fusion; Lumbar spine; Motion-sparing implants; Spinal arthrodesis

Year:  2013        PMID: 24303453      PMCID: PMC3845930          DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v1.i1.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Clin Cases        ISSN: 2307-8960            Impact factor:   1.337


  72 in total

1.  A prospective comparison of surgical approach for anterior L4-L5 fusion: laparoscopic versus mini anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  T A Zdeblick; S M David
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: an analysis of 600 cases.

Authors:  W Blake Rodgers; Edward J Gerber; Jamie Patterson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Effect of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System after complete laminectomy-facetectomy on the biomechanics of implanted and adjacent segments.

Authors:  Frank M Phillips; Michael N Tzermiadianos; Leonard I Voronov; Robert M Havey; Gerard Carandang; Susan M Renner; David M Rosler; Jorge A Ochoa; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  Early complications of spinal pedicle screw.

Authors:  A A Faraj; J K Webb
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: two-year follow-up results.

Authors:  James F Zucherman; Ken Y Hsu; Charles A Hartjen; Thomas F Mehalic; Dante A Implicito; Michael J Martin; Donald R Johnson; Grant A Skidmore; Paul P Vessa; James W Dwyer; Stephen T Puccio; Joseph C Cauthen; Richard M Ozuna
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries.

Authors:  F Denis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Outcome of Wisconsin instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis. Minimum 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  C L Jeng; P D Sponseller; V T Tolo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems.

Authors:  Brook I Martin; Richard A Deyo; Sohail K Mirza; Judith A Turner; Bryan A Comstock; William Hollingworth; Sean D Sullivan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Major vascular injury during anterior lumbar spinal surgery: incidence, risk factors, and management.

Authors:  Gary A Fantini; Ioannis P Pappou; Federico P Girardi; Harvinder S Sandhu; Frank P Cammisa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Interbody cage devices.

Authors:  Thomas A Zdeblick; Frank M Phillips
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  5 in total

1.  Surgical treatments for degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a meta analysis.

Authors:  Guohua Wang; Jianzhong Hu; Xiangyang Liu; Yong Cao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics.

Authors:  Jeff A Lehmen; Edward J Gerber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Lumbar interbody fusion with porous biphasic calcium phosphate enhanced by recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-2/silk fibroin sustained-released microsphere: an experimental study on sheep model.

Authors:  Liang Chen; Hai-Long Liu; Yong Gu; Yu Feng; Hui-Lin Yang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Posterior Spinal Reconstruction with Pedicle Screws, Multiple Iliac Screws and Wisconsin Spinal Wires in a Patient with Neurofibromatosis Scoliosis: A Case Report.

Authors:  Woong-Beom Kim; Young-Seop Park; Jong-Hwa Park; Seung-Jae Hyun
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2015-09-30

5.  We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.