Literature DB >> 26957098

Adjacent segment degeneration and revision surgery after circumferential lumbar fusion: outcomes throughout 15 years of follow-up.

José I Maruenda1, Carlos Barrios2, Felipe Garibo1, Borja Maruenda3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This retrospective study analyzes long-term outcomes (15 years) of circumferential lumbar fusion (CF) for degenerative spine disease using instrumented PLIF. The occurrence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) and the reintervention rate was specially focused.
METHODS: A series of 73 patients who underwent CF (1-3 levels) was reviewed. Patients were evaluated preoperatively, at 2, 5, 10 and 15 years after surgery with static and dynamic radiographic studies, CT scan and MRI. Patients completed also the Oswestry-Disability index (ODI), the VAS score, and the patient self-satisfaction questionnaire.
RESULTS: At 2-year follow-up, there was a decrease in the average ODI score (from 72.3 ± 16.4 preop to 30.5 ± 6.2). At 10- and 15-year follow-up, ODI scores return to preoperative scores in patients without revision surgery. The 82.8 % of patients referred an excellentgood self-satisfaction rate at this time. At 5-year follow-up, seven patients (9.6 %) required reoperation because of symptomatic ASD. At 10-year follow-up, reoperated patients increased to 24.6 % (18 cases). Excellent and good self-satisfaction rate decreased to 41.1 % at this time. Radiological ASD was then detected in 37 cases (50.7 %). At 15-year follow-up, nine patients were lost and a total of 24 (37.5 %) required a new surgical treatment because of ASD. The occurrence of revision surgery because of symptomatic ASD was highly dependent of the age of patients at the first surgery and the number of fused levels.
CONCLUSION: Circumferential lumbar fusion provides good clinical results at short-term follow-up. From 2- to 15-year follow-up, outcome worsened significantly. The high rate of ASD occurrence and reintervention questions the reliability of this technique for lumbar fusion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjacent segment degeneration; Circumferential lumbar fusion; Degenerative spine disease; Revision surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26957098     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4469-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  29 in total

1.  Long-term follow-up study of posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  S Nakai; H Yoshizawa; S Kobayashi
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1999-08

2.  Anterior/posterior lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of complications and predictive factors.

Authors:  H T Hee; F P Castro; M E Majd; R T Holt; L Myers
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  2001-12

3.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technique, complications, and early results.

Authors:  W S Rosenberg; P V Mummaneni
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Pedicle screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis: does posterior lumbar interbody fusion improve outcome over posterolateral fusion?

Authors:  Giovanni La Rosa; Alfredo Conti; Fabio Cacciola; Salvatore Cardali; Domenico La Torre; Nicola Maria Gambadauro; Francesco Tomasello
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: implications for the restoration of foraminal height, local disc angle, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance.

Authors:  Patrick C Hsieh; Tyler R Koski; Brian A O'Shaughnessy; Patrick Sugrue; Sean Salehi; Stephen Ondra; John C Liu
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2007-10

6.  Comparison of polyetheretherketone cages with femoral cortical bone allograft as a single-piece interbody spacer in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Aaron R Cutler; Saquib Siddiqui; Avinash L Mohan; Virany H Hillard; Franco Cerabona; Kaushik Das
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2006-12

7.  The variable screw placement spinal fixation system. Report of a prospective study of 250 patients enrolled in Food and Drug Administration clinical trials.

Authors:  A D Steffee; J W Brantigan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion.

Authors:  M N Kumar; A Baklanov; D Chopin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Comparison of instrumented anterior interbody fusion with instrumented circumferential lumbar fusion.

Authors:  S S Madan; N R Boeree
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-08-28       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Risk factors for progression of lumbar spine disc degeneration: the Chingford Study.

Authors:  G Hassett; D J Hart; N J Manek; D V Doyle; T D Spector
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2003-11
View more
  15 in total

1.  Reoperation of decompression alone or decompression plus fusion surgeries for degenerative lumbar diseases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zhao Lang; Jing-Sheng Li; Felix Yang; Yan Yu; Kamran Khan; Louis G Jenis; Thomas D Cha; James D Kang; Guoan Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Lumbar interbody fusion: recent advances in surgical techniques and bone healing strategies.

Authors:  Bin Meng; Joshua Bunch; Douglas Burton; Jinxi Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Reoperation within 2 years after lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Kazuyoshi Kobayashi; Kei Ando; Fumihiko Kato; Tokumi Kanemura; Koji Sato; Yudo Hachiya; Yuji Matsubara; Mitsuhiro Kamiya; Yoshihito Sakai; Hideki Yagi; Ryuichi Shinjo; Yoshihiro Nishida; Naoki Ishiguro; Shiro Imagama
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The association between Roussouly sagittal alignment type and risk for adjacent segment degeneration following short-segment lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Zhe Qu; Bin Deng; Xiao Gao; Bin Pan; Wei Sun; Hu Feng
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 2.562

5.  Investigation of Alterations in the Lumbar Disc Biomechanics at the Adjacent Segments After Spinal Fusion Using a Combined In Vivo and In Silico Approach.

Authors:  Chaochao Zhou; Thomas Cha; Wei Wang; Runsheng Guo; Guoan Li
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Implications of sagittal alignment and complication profile with stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior posterior lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Seth Ahlquist; Rachel Thommen; Howard Y Park; William Sheppard; Kevin James; Elizabeth Lord; Arya N Shamie; Don Y Park
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12

7.  Incidence and risk factors of adjacent segment disease following posterior decompression and instrumented fusion for degenerative lumbar disorders.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Lei Ma; Dalong Yang; Tao Wang; Sen Liu; Sidong Yang; Wenyuan Ding
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  One-stage posterior debridement, bone grafting fusion, and mono-segment vs. short-segment fixation for single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis: minimum 5-year follow-up outcomes.

Authors:  Zheng Liu; Weiwei Li; Zhengchao Xu; Xiyang Wang; Hao Zeng
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 9.  Incidence and risk factors of reoperation in patients with adjacent segment disease: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Major B Burch; Nicholas W Wiegers; Sonal Patil; Ali Nourbakhsh
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2020-04-04

10.  Posterior-only vs. combined posterior-anterior approaches in treating lumbar and lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis: a retrospective study with minimum 7-year follow-up.

Authors:  Zheng Liu; Penghui Zhang; Weiwei Li; Zhengchao Xu; Xiyang Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.