Literature DB >> 16075251

[Interbody metal implants ("cages") for lumbar fusion].

G Freiherr von Salis-Soglio1, R Scholz, K Seller.   

Abstract

Over the last 15 years, interbody metal implants have become commonly used worldwide for lumbar interbody fusion. The so called "cages" are made of metal or absorbable materials. By using different surgical techniques, they can be implanted either regularly or via endoscopy. The published results on surgical techniques using cages for the lumbar spine show, in most cases and with or without additional instrumentation, rates of fusion of more than 90%. It seems that the use of osteoinductive substances (especially BMP) leads to even better results. Dorsoventral fusion with internal fixation and bone show the same rate of consolidation, but the advantages of cages are primarily in the maintenance of the distraction and the possibility of a single surgical procedure without additional instrumentation (including endoscopy), and in a lower donor side morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16075251     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-005-0840-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  74 in total

1.  Is laparoscopic approach to lumbar spine fusion worthwhile?

Authors:  N Katkhouda; G M Campos; E Mavor; R J Mason; M Hume; A Ting
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  [Initial stability of two PLIF-techniques. A biomechanical comparison using a finite element model].

Authors:  T Pitzen; D Matthis; W Caspar; H Müller-Storz; W I Steudel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  [One-segment interbody lumbar arthrodesis using impacted cages: posterior unilateral approach versus posterior bilateral approach].

Authors:  J Commarmond
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  2001-04

4.  In vivo evaluation of a resorbable osteoinductive composite as a graft substitute for lumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  S D Boden; J H Schimandle; W C Hutton; C J Damien; J J Benedict; C Baranowski; S Collier
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1997-02

5.  The use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP-2) to promote spinal fusion in a nonhuman primate anterior interbody fusion model.

Authors:  B P Hecht; J S Fischgrund; H N Herkowitz; L Penman; J M Toth; A Shirkhoda
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine interbody fusion cages.

Authors:  F Kandziora; R Pflugmacher; J Schäfer; C Born; G Duda; N P Haas; T Mittlmeier
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  In vitro biomechanical investigation of the stability and stress-shielding effect of lumbar interbody fusion devices.

Authors:  M Kanayama; B W Cunningham; C J Haggerty; K Abumi; K Kaneda; P C McAfee
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Direct current electrical stimulation increases the fusion rate of spinal fusion cages.

Authors:  J M Toth; H B Seim; J D Schwardt; W B Humphrey; J A Wallskog; A S Turner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Lumbar spine fusion by local gene therapy with a cDNA encoding a novel osteoinductive protein (LMP-1).

Authors:  S D Boden; L Titus; G Hair; Y Liu; M Viggeswarapu; M S Nanes; C Baranowski
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Bioresorbable polymer implants in the unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedure.

Authors:  Thomas G Lowe; Jeffrey D Coe
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.