Literature DB >> 25210567

The usefulness of stone density and patient stoutness in predicting extracorporeal shock wave efficiency: Results in a North African ethnic group.

Hamdoune Abdelaziz1, Yassine Elabiad1, Ilyas Aderrouj1, Abdellatif Janane1, Mohamed Ghadouane1, Ahmed Ameur1, Mohamed Abbar1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We determine the role of stone density and skin-to-stone distance (SSD) by non-contrast computed tomography of the kidneys, ureters and bladder (CT-KUB) in predicting the success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL).
METHODS: We evaluated 89 patients who received ESWL for renal and upper ureteric calculi measuring 5 to 20 mm, over a 12-month period. The mean stone density in Hounsfield units (HU) and mean SSD in mm was determined on pre-treatment CT-KUB at the CT workstation. ESWL was successful if post-treatment residual stone fragments were ≤3 mm.
RESULTS: ESWL success was observed in 68.5% of patients. Mean stone densities were 505 ± 153 and 803 ± 93 HU in the ESWL successful and failure groups, respectively (p < 0.001, student's t-test). The mean SSD were 10.6 ± 2.0 and 11.2 ± 2.6 cm in ESWL successful and failure groups, respectively; this was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that stone density can help to predict the outcome of ESWL. We propose that stone density <500 HU are highly likely to result in successful ESWL. Conversely, stone densities >800 HU are less likely to be successful.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25210567      PMCID: PMC4137029          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.1849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  20 in total

1.  Accuracy of detection and measurement of renal calculi: in vitro comparison of three-dimensional spiral CT, radiography, and nephrotomography.

Authors:  E W Olcott; F G Sommer; S Napel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Urolithiasis: detection and management with unenhanced spiral CT--a urologic perspective.

Authors:  G M Preminger; J Vieweg; R A Leder; R C Nelson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Management of calyceal calculi.

Authors:  T D Cohen; G M Preminger
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.241

4.  Radiographic prognostic criteria for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: a study of 485 patients.

Authors:  D Bon; B Dore; J Irani; M Marroncle; J Aubert
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  In situ extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of distal ureteral stones: parameters for therapeutic success.

Authors:  P Mattelaer; T Schröder; N Fischer; G Jakse
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 6.  Progress in the use of helical CT for imaging urinary calculi.

Authors:  James C Williams; Samuel C Kim; Chad A Zarse; James A McAteer; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Prediction of fragility of urinary calculi by dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Anil Mandhani; Maniyur Raghavendran; Aneesh Srivastava; Rakesh Kapoor; Uttam Singh; Anant Kumar; Mahendra Bhandari
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Sex- and age-related composition of 10 617 calculi analyzed by infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  M Daudon; R Donsimoni; C Hennequin; S Fellahi; G Le Moel; M Paris; S Troupel; B Lacour
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1995

9.  Outcomes using a fourth-generation lithotripter: a new benchmark for comparison?

Authors:  Michael S Nomikos; Steven J Sowter; David A Tolley
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves.

Authors:  C Chaussy; W Brendel; E Schmiedt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-12-13       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  4 in total

1.  Histogram of kidney stones on non-contrast computed tomography to predict successful stone dusting during retrograde intrarenal surgery.

Authors:  Dong Soo Kim; Sung Kyoung Moon; Sang Hyub Lee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Non-Contrast Computed Tomography Scan Based Parameters of Ureteric Stones Affecting the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Muhammad Waqas; Mohammad Ayaz Khan; Muhammad Waqas Iqbal; Mian Khalid Akbar; Imad-Ud-Din Saqib; Saeed Akhter
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-05-05

3.  External Validation of the S.T.O.N.E. Score in Predicting Stone-Free Status After Rigid Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Noppavut Sirirak; Premsant Sangkum; Yada Phengsalae; Wisoot Kongchareonsombat; Charoen Leenanupunth; Wattanachai Ratanapornsompong; Chinnakhet Ketsuwan
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2021-03-23

4.  The effect of stone and patient characteristics in predicting extra-corporal shock wave lithotripsy success rate: A cross sectional study.

Authors:  Mohammad Al-Zubi; Ammar Al Sleibi; Basel Mazen Elayan; Subhi Zahi Al-Issawi; Morad Bani-Hani; Adel Alsharei; Jad AlSmadi; Saleh Abualhaj; Ala' Y Ibrahim
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-09-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.