Literature DB >> 28717539

Single session vs two sessions of flexible ureterosopy (FURS) for dusting of renal pelvic stones 2-3 cm in diameter: Does stone size or hardness play a role in number of sessions to be applied?"

Ahmed Mamdouh Abd El Hamed1, Hazem Elmoghazy1, Mohamed Aldahshoury2, Ahmed Riad1, Mohammed Mostafa2, Fawzy Farag1, Wael Gamal1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the stone hardness in predicting the need for single or two sessions of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for renal pelvis stones of 2-3 cm in size.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety-six patients (64 male and 32 female) with only renal stones (2.5±0.3 cm) underwent RIRS using flexible 7.5 Fr ureteroscope (FURS). The stone hardness was evaluated by preoperative non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT). The patients were divided into two groups based on stone hardness: Group I (n=54) (hard stones - Hounsfield Unit (HU) >1000) and group II (n=42) (not hard stone - HU <1000). The stone-free rate, the operative time, any intra or postoperative complications and the need for second sessions of RIRS were evaluated.
RESULTS: All stones were successfully accessed. Intraoperative complications were not reported. The initial stone-free rate was 40% in Group I and 95% in Group II after a single session (p=0.01). A second session FURS was needed in 32 cases of Group I (40%) where postoperative CT showed significant residual stone fragments of 6±2 mm, and stone-free rate up to 100 percent. On the contrary only 2 cases from Group II underwent second session FURS (p=0.01). The operative times were 75±15 minutes in Group I and 55±13 minutes in Group II (p<0.01). Six patients (4 in group I and 2 in group II) had postoperative high-grade fever (Clavien Grade II).
CONCLUSION: Stone hardness had a significant impact on the decision of performing single versus two sessions of FURS for renal pelvic stones of 2-3 cm rather than the stone size alone.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flexible ureterosopy; retrograde intrarenal surgery; stone hardness

Year:  2017        PMID: 28717539      PMCID: PMC5503434          DOI: 10.5152/tud.2017.61257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Urol        ISSN: 2149-3235


  21 in total

Review 1.  Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones >2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Omar M Aboumarzouk; Manoj Monga; Slawomir G Kata; Olivier Traxer; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Clinical factors prolonging the operative time of flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones: a single-center analysis.

Authors:  Hiroki Ito; Shinnosuke Kuroda; Takashi Kawahara; Kazuhide Makiyama; Masahiro Yao; Junichi Matsuzaki
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Heterogeneity in the reporting of disease characteristics and treatment outcomes in studies evaluating treatments for nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  Elias S Hyams; Aron Bruhn; Michael Lipkin; Ojas Shah
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Computed tomographic analysis of urinary calculi.

Authors:  J H Newhouse; E L Prien; E S Amis; S P Dretler; R C Pfister
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  The Effect of Stone Composition on the Efficacy of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: Kidney Stones 1 - 3 cm in Diameter.

Authors:  Yuquan Xue; Peng Zhang; Xiaojie Yang; Tie Chong
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Prediction of morbidity and mortality after percutaneous nephrolithotomy by using the Charlson Comorbidity Index.

Authors:  Ali Unsal; Berkan Resorlu; Ali Fuat Atmaca; Akif Diri; Hasan Nedim Goksel Goktug; Ceren Eda Can; Bahri Gok; Can Tuygun; Cankon Germiyonoglu
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  RIRS versus mPCNL for single renal stone of 2-3 cm: clinical outcome and cost-effective analysis in Chinese medical setting.

Authors:  Jiahua Pan; Qi Chen; Wei Xue; Yonghui Chen; Lei Xia; Haige Chen; Yiran Huang
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Retrograde ureteroscopy for renal stones larger than 2.5 cm.

Authors:  Julie M Riley; Laura Stearman; Scott Troxel
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Evaluation of preoperative measurement of stone surface area as a predictor of stone-free status after combined ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Hiroki Ito; Takashi Kawahara; Hideyuki Terao; Takehiko Ogawa; Masahiro Yao; Yoshinobu Kubota; Junichi Matsuzaki
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  A comparative study of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in supine position and endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery with flexible instrument.

Authors:  I Nuño de la Rosa; J L Palmero; J Miralles; J C Pastor; A Benedicto
Journal:  Actas Urol Esp       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 0.994

View more
  1 in total

1.  Prediction of stone-free status after single-session retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones.

Authors:  Şenol Tonyalı; Mehmet Yılmaz; Mustafa Karaaslan; Cavit Ceylan; Levent Işıkay
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.