Literature DB >> 11247897

Flexible sigmoidoscopy and the changing distribution of colorectal cancer: implications for screening.

K McCallion1, R M Mitchell, R H Wilson, F Kee, R G Watson, J S Collins, K R Gardiner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There has been a significant proximal shift in the distribution of colorectal cancer (CRC) in Northern Ireland over recent decades. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential implications of this proximal shift in CRC distribution on the efficacy of flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) as a screening tool. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The site distribution of 5153 CRCs was available from the Northern Ireland Colorectal Cancer Register for the period 1990-1997. Similar data on 1241 CRCs between 1976 and 1978 were available from a previous study. Data on the site reached by FS were obtained from a prospectively collected endoscopy database at one of Northern Ireland's main teaching hospitals for the period 1993-1998.
RESULTS: There was a significant proximal shift in CRC distribution between the two periods (23.5% proximal to the splenic flexure between 1976 and 1978 v 36.7% between 1990 and 1997; p<0.001). The descending colon was visualised during 74.4% of FS examinations. By combining the observed extent of FS examination with CRC site distribution, it was calculated that FS could have visualised 68.8% of CRCs between 1976 and 1978 but only 56.0% between 1990 and 1997. Extrapolating these data to a Northern Ireland screening programme involving FS and faecal occult blood testing suggests that significantly more CRCs could have been detected between 1976 and 1978 than between 1990 and 1997 (51.7% v 48.2%, respectively; p=0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the previously documented left to right shift in CRC distribution in Northern Ireland and demonstrates that if this shift continues, FS will become less successful as a screening tool than is currently predicted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11247897      PMCID: PMC1728246          DOI: 10.1136/gut.48.4.522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  23 in total

Review 1.  The case for surveillance of high-risk' families.

Authors:  M G Dunlop
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.566

Review 2.  Molecular approaches for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  J Jen; C Johnson; B Levin
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.566

3.  Safe duodenoscopic intubation in a patient with a large Zenker's diverticulum.

Authors:  S L Kadish; D O Faigel; W B Long
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 4.  What can we conclude from the randomized controlled trials of fecal occult blood test screening?

Authors:  C A Lang; D F Ransohoff
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.566

5.  Screening for bowel cancer. Overview.

Authors:  J Northover
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.566

Review 6.  Screening for colorectal cancer: alternative faecal occult blood tests.

Authors:  G P Young
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.566

7.  Prospective determination of distal colon findings in average-risk patients with proximal colon cancer.

Authors:  D K Rex; A Chak; R Vasudeva; T Gross; D Lieberman; I Bhattacharya; E Sack; M Wiersema; F Farraye; M Wallace; D Barrido; E Cravens; L Zeabart; D Bjorkman; T Lemmel; S Buckley
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Cancer statistics, 1998.

Authors:  S H Landis; T Murray; S Bolden; P A Wingo
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test.

Authors:  O Kronborg; C Fenger; J Olsen; O D Jørgensen; O Søndergaard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  Flexible sigmoidoscopy as a mass screening tool.

Authors:  W S Atkin
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.566

View more
  16 in total

1.  Are proximal colorectal cancers always associated with distal adenomas?

Authors:  A J M Watson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Antagonist: population based endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D A L Macafee; J H Scholefield
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Evaluation of flexible sigmoidoscopy as an investigation for "left sided" colorectal symptoms.

Authors:  S Papagrigoriadis; I Arunkumar; A Koreli; W A Corbett
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  The NordICC Study: rationale and design of a randomized trial on colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M F Kaminski; M Bretthauer; A G Zauber; E J Kuipers; H-O Adami; M van Ballegooijen; J Regula; M van Leerdam; T Stefansson; L Påhlman; E Dekker; M A Hernán; K Garborg; G Hoff
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 5.  The Association between Distal Findings and Proximal Colorectal Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jason L W Huang; Y H Wang; Johnny Y Jiang; C P Yu; Y L Wu; P Chen; X Q Yuan; Harry H X Wang; Martin C S Wong
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Colorectal cancer is increasing in rural Kenya: challenges and perspectives.

Authors:  Robert K Parker; Sinkeet S Ranketi; Calvin McNelly; Matilda Ongondi; Hillary M Topazian; Sanford M Dawsey; Gwen A Murphy; Russell E White; Michael Mwachiro
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Changes in outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: one surgeon's experience.

Authors:  J M Kiely; E G Kavanagh; A M Guiney; C Fiuza-Castineira; P V Delaney
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2005 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  The effectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy as the primary method for investigating colorectal symptoms in low-risk patients.

Authors:  S A Badger; R Gilliland; P J D Neilly
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in the average risk population.

Authors:  Moshe Leshno; Zamir Halpern; Nadir Arber
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2003-08

10.  Racial/ethnic variation in the anatomic subsite location of in situ and invasive cancers of the colon.

Authors:  Vickie L Shavers
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.798

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.