Literature DB >> 9585022

Screening for colorectal cancer: alternative faecal occult blood tests.

G P Young1.   

Abstract

Hemoccult-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, while shown to be effective in randomized controlled trials, is suboptimal; alternative faecal occult blood tests which are either modifications of current guaiac-peroxidase tests or newer technologies (immunochemical), are available and show real promise. The goals of the alternative tests are improved sensitivity with acceptable specificity and improved compliance by screenees. The process of demonstrating superiority to Hemoccult need not include mortality as an endpoint, but must involve a direct comparison in large numbers of screenees (say 20,000) with cancer yields, apparent specificity and compliance determined for each test. Only the more sensitive and more readable guaiac test, HemoccultSENSA, and the immunochemical test Immudia-HemSp (the international version is HemeSelect) have undergone such extensive testing and could be considered as acceptable alternatives to Hemoccult for population-based screening. Even then, the test positivity rate of HemoccultSENSA warrants checking in a pilot study in the target population because it may pose a problem of specificity in some populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9585022     DOI: 10.1097/00042737-199803000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0954-691X            Impact factor:   2.566


  5 in total

1.  Flexible sigmoidoscopy and the changing distribution of colorectal cancer: implications for screening.

Authors:  K McCallion; R M Mitchell; R H Wilson; F Kee; R G Watson; J S Collins; K R Gardiner
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of immunochemical versus guaiac faecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Adolfo Parra-Blanco; Antonio Z Gimeno-García; Enrique Quintero; David Nicolás; Santiago G Moreno; Alejandro Jiménez; Manuel Hernández-Guerra; Marta Carrillo-Palau; Yoshinobu Eishi; Julio López-Bastida
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 7.527

3.  Circulating MIC-1/GDF15 is a complementary screening biomarker with CEA and correlates with liver metastasis and poor survival in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Xiaobing Wang; Zhaogang Yang; Haimei Tian; Yanfen Li; Mo Li; Wenya Zhao; Chao Zhang; Teng Wang; Jing Liu; Aili Zhang; Di Shen; Cuining Zheng; Jun Qi; Dan Zhao; Junfeng Shi; Liliang Jin; Jianyu Rao; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-11

4.  Dynamic Monitoring of Systemic Biomarkers with Gastric Sensors.

Authors:  Christoph Steiger; Nhi V Phan; Hen-Wei Huang; Haoying Sun; Jacqueline N Chu; Daniel Reker; Declan Gwynne; Joy Collins; Siddartha Tamang; Rebecca McManus; Aaron Lopes; Alison Hayward; Rebecca M Baron; Edy Y Kim; Giovanni Traverso
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 16.806

5.  Recommendations for a step-wise comparative approach to the evaluation of new screening tests for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Graeme P Young; Carlo Senore; Jack S Mandel; James E Allison; Wendy S Atkin; Robert Benamouzig; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Mahinda De Silva; Lydia Guittet; Stephen P Halloran; Ulrike Haug; Geir Hoff; Steven H Itzkowitz; Marcis Leja; Bernard Levin; Gerrit A Meijer; Colm A O'Morain; Susan Parry; Linda Rabeneck; Paul Rozen; Hiroshi Saito; Robert E Schoen; Helen E Seaman; Robert J C Steele; Joseph J Y Sung; Sidney J Winawer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.