Literature DB >> 22723185

The NordICC Study: rationale and design of a randomized trial on colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer.

M F Kaminski1, M Bretthauer, A G Zauber, E J Kuipers, H-O Adami, M van Ballegooijen, J Regula, M van Leerdam, T Stefansson, L Påhlman, E Dekker, M A Hernán, K Garborg, G Hoff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: While colonoscopy screening is widely used in several European countries and the United States, there are no randomized trials to quantify its benefits. The Nordic-European Initiative on Colorectal Cancer (NordICC) is a multinational, randomized controlled trial aiming at investigating the effect of colonoscopy screening on colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality. This paper describes the rationale and design of the NordICC trial. STUDY
DESIGN: Men and women aged 55 to 64 years are drawn from the population registries in the participating countries and randomly assigned to either once-only colonoscopy screening with removal of all detected lesions, or no screening (standard of care in the trial regions). All individuals are followed for 15 years after inclusion using dedicated national registries. The primary end points of the trial are cumulative CRC-specific death and CRC incidence during 15 years of follow-up. POWER ANALYSIS: We hypothesize a 50 % CRC mortality-reducing efficacy of the colonoscopy intervention and predict 50 % compliance, yielding a 25 % mortality reduction among those invited to screening. For 90 % power and a two-sided alpha level of 0.05, using a 2:1 randomization, 45 600 individuals will be randomized to control, and 22 800 individuals to the colonoscopy group. Interim analyses of the effect of colonoscopy on CRC incidence and mortality will be performed at 10-year follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: The aim of the NordICC trial is to quantify the effectiveness of population-based colonoscopy screening. This will allow development of evidence-based guidelines for CRC screening in the general population. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22723185      PMCID: PMC5435368          DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1306895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  49 in total

1.  Is there a true "shift" to the right colon in the incidence of colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Linda Rabeneck; Jessica A Davila; Hashem B El-Serag
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Quality assurance as an integrated part of the electronic medical record - a prototype applied for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Geir Hoff; Per Marcus Ottestad; Stein Roger Skafløtten; Michael Bretthauer; Volker Moritz
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.423

3.  A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials.

Authors:  P C O'Brien; T R Fleming
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice.

Authors:  D K Rex; E Y Rahmani; J H Haseman; G T Lemmel; S Kaster; J S Buckley
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J D Hardcastle; J O Chamberlain; M H Robinson; S M Moss; S S Amar; T W Balfour; P D James; C M Mangham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Comparing attendance and detection rate of colonoscopy with sigmoidoscopy and FIT for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Nereo Segnan; Carlo Senore; Bruno Andreoni; Alberto Azzoni; Luigi Bisanti; Alessandro Cardelli; Guido Castiglione; Cristiano Crosta; Andrea Ederle; Alberto Fantin; Arnaldo Ferrari; Mario Fracchia; Franco Ferrero; Stefano Gasperoni; Serafino Recchia; Mauro Risio; Tiziana Rubeca; Giorgio Saracco; Marco Zappa
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Meredith A Goldwasser; Lawrence F Paszat; Refik Saskin; David R Urbach; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Gavin C Harewood; Maurits J Wiersema; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Impact of colorectal cancer screening on future lifestyle choices: a three-year randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Inger K Larsen; Tom Grotmol; Kari Almendingen; Geir Hoff
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  Appointments timed in proximity to annual milestones and compliance with screening: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Geir Hoff; Michael Bretthauer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-12-17
View more
  49 in total

1.  Emergent Colectomy Is Independently Associated with Decreased Long-Term Overall Survival in Colon Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Zhaomin Xu; Adan Z Becerra; Christopher T Aquina; Bradley J Hensley; Carla F Justiniano; Courtney Boodry; Alex A Swanger; Reza Arsalanizadeh; Katia Noyes; John R Monson; Fergal J Fleming
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: long-term follow-up of the randomised US PLCO cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Eric A Miller; Paul F Pinsky; Robert E Schoen; Philip C Prorok; Timothy R Church
Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-11-29

Review 3.  Faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening: the past or the future.

Authors:  Sally C Benton; Helen E Seaman; Stephen P Halloran
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2015-02

4.  Gradual stiffness versus magnetic imaging-guided variable stiffness colonoscopes: A randomized noninferiority trial.

Authors:  Kjetil Garborg; Håvard Wiig; Audun Hasund; Jon Matre; Øyvind Holme; Geir Noraberg; Magnus Løberg; Mette Kalager; Hans-Olov Adami; Michael Bretthauer
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.623

5.  The necessity of colorectal cancer screening for elderly patients.

Authors:  Shin-Ei Kudo; Toyoki Kudo
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-03-23

6.  Endoscopic colorectal cancer screening provides long-lasting effect.

Authors:  Jaroslaw Regula; Michal F Kaminski
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.623

7.  The Foundation in Evidence of Medical and Dental Telephone Consultations.

Authors:  Martina Albrecht; Florian Isenbeck; Jüürgen Kasper; Ingrid Mühlhauser; Anke Steckelberg
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 8.  The impact of screening on colorectal cancer mortality and incidence: has it really made a difference?

Authors:  Ann G Zauber
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 9.  Colorectal cancer screening--optimizing current strategies and new directions.

Authors:  Ernst J Kuipers; Thomas Rösch; Michael Bretthauer
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 10.  Colorectal cancer screening: 20 years of development and recent progress.

Authors:  Miroslav Zavoral; Stepan Suchanek; Ondrej Majek; Premysl Fric; Petra Minarikova; Marek Minarik; Bohumil Seifert; Ladislav Dusek
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.