Literature DB >> 10343217

Prospective determination of distal colon findings in average-risk patients with proximal colon cancer.

D K Rex1, A Chak, R Vasudeva, T Gross, D Lieberman, I Bhattacharya, E Sack, M Wiersema, F Farraye, M Wallace, D Barrido, E Cravens, L Zeabart, D Bjorkman, T Lemmel, S Buckley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent guidelines indicate that colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy are both acceptable options for screening average-risk patients for colorectal cancer. Retrospective studies have found that a majority of patients with cancer proximal to the splenic flexure have a normal screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.
METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective description of colonoscopic findings and family history in consecutive patients with proximal colon cancer.
RESULTS: Among 116 prospectively identified average-risk patients with cancer proximal to the splenic flexure, 40 (34.5%) had neoplasia distal to the splenic flexure. The prevalence of patients with adenomas greater than or equal to 1 cm, with only one tubular adenoma less than 1 cm, and with only hyperplastic polyps were 16.4%, 8.6%, and 6.9%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Most average-risk patients with cancer proximal to the splenic flexure will have a normal screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. These patients have an unexpectedly high prevalence of large distal adenomas, but the prevalence of both single small tubular adenomas and hyperplastic polyps alone is similar to that expected during screening of the general population. Clinicians and payers should continue to seek methods to improve the cost-effectiveness and availability of screening colonoscopy in average-risk persons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10343217     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(99)70290-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  9 in total

1.  [Colorectal cancer in Germany. Means for prevention and early detection: implications for laiety and physicians].

Authors:  A Eickhoff; C Maar; B Birkner; J F Riemann
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  Screening for colon cancer.

Authors:  J P Heiken
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 3.909

3.  Rectosigmoid findings are not associated with proximal colon cancer: analysis of 6 196 consecutive cases undergoing total colonoscopy.

Authors:  Makoto Okamoto; Takao Kawabe; Yutaka Yamaji; Jun Kato; Tsuneo Ikenoue; Goichi Togo; Haruhiko Yoshida; Yasushi Shiratori; Masao Omata
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Flexible sigmoidoscopy and the changing distribution of colorectal cancer: implications for screening.

Authors:  K McCallion; R M Mitchell; R H Wilson; F Kee; R G Watson; J S Collins; K R Gardiner
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Screening for colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  P H Gordon
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Feasibility study of colonoscopy as the primary screening investigation in relatives of patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J M Gilbert; C J Vaizey; P G Cassell; J Holden
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Screening techniques for prevention and early detection of colorectal cancer in the average-risk population.

Authors:  Hana Strul; Nadir Arber
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2007-05

8.  Risk of advanced proximal adenoma and cancer according to rectosigmoid findings in the Korean population.

Authors:  Yong Woo Chung; Dong Soo Han; Yoon Kyung Park; Byoung Kwan Son; Chang Hee Paik; Yong Cheol Jeon; Joo Hyun Sohn
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 3.487

9.  Screening for Familial Colorectal Cancer Risk amongst Colonoscopy Patients New to an Open-Access Endoscopy Center.

Authors:  Sumana Moole; Thomas J McGarrity; Maria J Baker
Journal:  ISRN Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03-22
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.