Literature DB >> 11224860

Ventral discectomy with pmma interbody fusion for cervical disc disease: long-term results in 249 patients.

C Hamburger1, F V Festenberg, E Uhl.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective study of patients who underwent ventral discectomy and polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA) interbody fusion for cervical radiculopathy.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term outcome after ventral discectomy and PMMA interbody fusion and to compare it with previous data from other surgical techniques for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Because PMMA interbody fusion after ventral discectomy does not result in solid bony fusion in all cases, a good long-term outcome using this surgical technique has been questioned.
METHODS: Long-term follow-up evaluation after surgery was performed in 249 patients (96 women and 153 men) with radicular signs only. The mean age was 46.0 +/- 8.7 years (range, 24-74 years), and the observation time ranged from 10-15 years (mean, 12.2 +/- 1.2 years). Clinical grading after surgery according to Odom's criteria was based on a questionnaire. The outcome was related to morphologic findings, lumbar symptoms, physical stress, duration of symptoms, age, sex, and cervical level involved.
RESULTS: Complications related to surgery occurred in 13 (5.2%) patients, but only three (1.2%) had persistent problems. Of the 249 patients, 101 (40.6%) were without any symptoms (Odom I), 92 (36.9%) had a good outcome (Odom II), and 47 (18.9%) a fair outcome (Odom III). Only nine patients (3.6%) reported an unchanged or worse status than before surgery (Odom IV). Additional lumbar symptoms, high occupational physical stress, and discrepancy of preoperative findings were significantly correlated with a worse outcome. Short duration of symptoms and soft disc disease were favorable prognostic factors.
CONCLUSIONS: PMMA interbody fusion after ventral discectomy in cervical disc surgery is a safe and reliable method with few complications and an outcome comparable with other ventral procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11224860     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200102010-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  16 in total

1.  Use of cervical stand-alone cages.

Authors:  Wolfgang Börm; Klaus Seitz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  [HAC-titanium as an implant for interbody fusion in spinal canal stenosis of the cervical spine. Six-year clinical trial].

Authors:  D Daentzer; S Asamoto; D-K Böker
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Predictive factors for long-term outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion: a multivariate data analysis.

Authors:  Anneli Peolsson; Michael Peolsson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Long-term randomised comparison between a carbon fibre cage and the Cloward procedure in the cervical spine.

Authors:  Anneli Peolsson; Ludek Vavruch; Rune Hedlund
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Subsidence after anterior cervical inter-body fusion. A randomized prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Erich Kast; Sharam Derakhshani; Matthias Bothmann; Joachim Oberle
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Investigation of clinically important benefit of anterior cervical decompression and fusion.

Authors:  Anneli Peolsson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-12-02       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Polymethylmethacrylate-assisted ventral discectomy: rate of pseudarthrosis and clinical outcome with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

Authors:  Mario Cabraja; Daniel Koeppen; Wolfgang R Lanksch; Klaus Maier-Hauff; Stefan Kroppenstedt
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Prediction of fusion and importance of radiological variables for the outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion.

Authors:  Anneli Peolsson; Rune Hedlund; Ludek Vavruch
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-01-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Bone graft substitutes in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Anthony M T Chau; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  A prospective clinical comparison of rectangular titanium cages and iliac crest autografts in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Claudius Thomé; Joachim K Krauss; Dimitris Zevgaridis
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2003-08-02       Impact factor: 3.042

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.