Literature DB >> 21711527

Polymethylmethacrylate-assisted ventral discectomy: rate of pseudarthrosis and clinical outcome with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

Mario Cabraja1, Daniel Koeppen, Wolfgang R Lanksch, Klaus Maier-Hauff, Stefan Kroppenstedt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) assisted ventral discectomy has been criticized for high rates of graft migration and pseudarthrosis when compared with various other fusion procedures for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD), therefore rendering it not the preferred choice of treatment today. Recently however spine surgery has been developing towards preservation rather than restriction of motion, indicating that fusion might not be necessary for clinical success. This study presents a long term comparison of clinical and radiological data from patients with pseudarthrosis and solid arthrodesis after PMMA assisted ventral discectomy was performed.
METHODS: From 1986 to 2004 416 patients underwent ventral discectomy and PMMA interposition for DDD. The clinical and radiological outcome was assessed for 50 of 127 eligible patients after a mean of 8.1 years. Based on postoperative radiographs the patients were dichotomized in those with a pseudarthrosis (group A) and those with solid arthrodesis (group B).
RESULTS: Pseudarthrosis with movement of more than 2 of the operated segment was noted in 17 cases (group A). In 33 cases no movement of the vertebral segment could be detected (group B). The analysis of the clinical data assessed through the neck disability index (NDI), the visual analogue scale (VAS) of neck and arm pain and Odom's criteria did not show any significant differences between the groups.Patients from group B showed a trend to higher adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) than group A (p = 0.06). This correlated with the age of the patients.
CONCLUSIONS: PMMA assisted discectomy shows a high rate of pseudarthrosis. But the clinical long-term success does not seem to be negatively affected by this.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21711527      PMCID: PMC3146462          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


  38 in total

1.  [Possibilities for cost reduction of implants in spinal surgery].

Authors:  U Vieweg
Journal:  Zentralbl Neurochir       Date:  2003

2.  Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine.

Authors:  Jan Goffin; Eric Geusens; Nicolaas Vantomme; Els Quintens; Yannic Waerzeggers; Bart Depreitere; Frank Van Calenbergh; Johan van Loon
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2004-04

3.  Use of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA).

Authors:  J Schröder
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  [Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) in anterior cervical spine surgery - current situation in Germany].

Authors:  J Schröder; H Wassmann
Journal:  Zentralbl Neurochir       Date:  2001

5.  [The ventral fusion in cervical osteochondrosis and its treatment results].

Authors:  W Grote; P Röttgen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1967       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  A randomized prospective study of an anterior cervical interbody fusion device with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up results.

Authors:  R J Hacker
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Titanium or polymethylmethacrylate in cervical disc surgery? A prospective study.

Authors:  B Jöllenbeck; N Fernandez; R Firsching
Journal:  Zentralbl Neurochir       Date:  2001

8.  Roentgenographic findings in the cervical spine in asymptomatic persons: a ten-year follow-up.

Authors:  D R Gore
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  A prospective randomized multicenter clinical evaluation of an anterior cervical fusion cage.

Authors:  R J Hacker; J C Cauthen; T J Gilbert; S L Griffith
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Titanium cage reconstruction after cervical corpectomy.

Authors:  Zeena Dorai; Howard Morgan; Caetano Coimbra
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  3 in total

1.  PMMA-Cement-PLIF Is Safe and Effective as a Single-Stage Posterior Procedure in Treating Pyogenic Erosive Lumbar Spondylodiscitis-A Single-Center Retrospective Study of 73 Cases.

Authors:  Moritz Caspar Deml; Emmanuelle N Cattaneo; Sebastian Frederick Bigdon; Hans-Jörg Sebald; Sven Hoppe; Paul Heini; Lorin Michael Benneker; Christoph Emanuel Albers
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-15

2.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone cages.

Authors:  Mario Cabraja; Soner Oezdemir; Daniel Koeppen; Stefan Kroppenstedt
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  PEEK cages versus PMMA spacers in anterior cervical discectomy: comparison of fusion, subsidence, sagittal alignment, and clinical outcome with a minimum 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Jan-Helge Klingler; Marie T Krüger; Ronen Sircar; Evangelos Kogias; Christoph Scholz; Florian Volz; Christian Scheiwe; Ulrich Hubbe
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-07-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.