Literature DB >> 11206204

Blocking and backward blocking involve learned inattention.

J K Kruschke1, N J Blair.   

Abstract

Four experiments examine blocking of associative learning by human participants in a disease diagnosis procedure. The results indicate that after a cue is blocked, subsequent learning about the cue is attenuated. This attenuated learning after blocking is obtained for both standard blocking and for backward blocking. Attenuated learning after blocking cannot be accounted for by theories such as the Rescorla-Wagner model that rely on lack of learning about a redundant cue, nor can it be accounted for by extensions of the Rescorla-Wagner model designed to address backward blocking that encode absent cues with negative values. The results are predicted by the hypothesis that people learn not to attend to the blocked cue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11206204     DOI: 10.3758/bf03213001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  14 in total

1.  Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: asymmetries in cue competition.

Authors:  M R Waldmann; K J Holyoak
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1992-06

2.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning.

Authors:  J K Kruschke
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Cue interaction in human contingency judgment.

Authors:  G B Chapman; S J Robbins
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-09

4.  The widespread influence of the Rescorla-Wagner model.

Authors:  S Siegel; L G Allan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-09

5.  Backward blocking and recovery from overshadowing in human causal judgement: the role of within-compound associations.

Authors:  E A Wasserman; L R Berglan
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1998-05

6.  Blocking as a function of novelty of CS and predictability of UCS.

Authors:  N J Mackintosh; C Turner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Blocking in human electrodermal conditioning.

Authors:  J Hinchy; P F Lovibond; K M Ter-Horst
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1995-02

Review 8.  Assessment of the Rescorla-Wagner model.

Authors:  R R Miller; R C Barnet; N J Grahame
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Similarity and discrimination: a selective review and a connectionist model.

Authors:  J M Pearce
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Base rates in category learning.

Authors:  J K Kruschke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  39 in total

1.  Extending the ALCOVE model of category learning to featural stimulus domains.

Authors:  Michael D Lee; Daniel J Navarro
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-03

Review 2.  A knowledge-resonance (KRES) model of category learning.

Authors:  Bob Rehder; Gregory L Murphy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

3.  Revisiting the role of within-compound associations in cue-interaction phenomena.

Authors:  David Luque; Amanda Flores; Miguel A Vadillo
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 4.  Evidence for the role of higher order reasoning processes in cue competition and other learning phenomena.

Authors:  Jan De Houwer; Tom Beckers; Stefaan Vandorpe
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Simulations of a modified SOP model applied to retrospective revaluation of human causal learning.

Authors:  Michael R F Aitken; Anthony Dickinson
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Attention and salience in associative blocking.

Authors:  Stephen E Denton; John K Kruschke
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Blocking in category learning.

Authors:  Lewis Bott; Aaron B Hoffman; Gregory L Murphy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-11

Review 8.  Attentional control of associative learning--a possible role of the central cholinergic system.

Authors:  Wolfgang M Pauli; Randall C O'Reilly
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Blocking in rabbit eyeblink conditioning is not due to learned inattention: indirect support for an error correction mechanism of blocking.

Authors:  M Todd Allen; Yahaira Padilla; Mark A Gluck
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec

10.  Association learning for emotional harbinger cues: when do previous emotional associations impair and when do they facilitate subsequent learning of new associations?

Authors:  Michiko Sakaki; Alexandra E Ycaza-Herrera; Mara Mather
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2013-10-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.