Literature DB >> 5148920

Blocking as a function of novelty of CS and predictability of UCS.

N J Mackintosh, C Turner.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1971        PMID: 5148920     DOI: 10.1080/14640747108400245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol        ISSN: 0033-555X            Impact factor:   2.143


× No keyword cloud information.
  15 in total

1.  Selective hippocampal lesions disrupt a novel cue effect but fail to eliminate blocking in rabbit eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  M Todd Allen; Yahaira Padilla; Catherine E Myers; Mark A Gluck
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Variations in unconditioned stimulus processing in unblocking.

Authors:  Peter C Holland; Cynthia Kenmuir
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2005-04

3.  Evidence that blocking is due to associative deficit: Blocking history affects the degree of subsequent associative competition.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-03

4.  Blocking and backward blocking involve learned inattention.

Authors:  J K Kruschke; N J Blair
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-12

5.  Blocking and nonsimultaneous compounds: comparison of responding during compound conditioning and testing.

Authors:  S J Gaioni
Journal:  Pavlov J Biol Sci       Date:  1982 Jan-Mar

6.  Context modulation of learned attention deployment.

Authors:  Metin Uengoer; John M Pearce; Harald Lachnit; Stephan Koenig
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 7.  Knowledge as process: contextually-cued attention and early word learning.

Authors:  Linda B Smith; Eliana Colunga; Hanako Yoshida
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-09

8.  Learned predictiveness effects following single-cue training in humans.

Authors:  M E Le Pelley; M N Turnbull; S J Reimers; R L Knipe
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Blocking in rabbit eyeblink conditioning is not due to learned inattention: indirect support for an error correction mechanism of blocking.

Authors:  M Todd Allen; Yahaira Padilla; Mark A Gluck
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec

10.  Attentional changes in blocking are not a consequence of lateral inhibition.

Authors:  Oren Griffiths; M E Le Pelley
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.