Literature DB >> 11190955

Monitor unit settings for intensity modulated beams delivered using a step-and-shoot approach.

M B Sharpe1, B M Miller, D Yan, J W Wong.   

Abstract

Two linear accelerators have been commissioned for delivering IMRT treatments using a step-and-shoot approach. To assess beam startup stability for 6 and 18 MV x-ray beams, dose delivered per monitor unit (MU), beam flatness, and beam symmetry were measured as a function of the total number of MU delivered at a clinical dose rate of 400 MU per minute. Relative to a 100 MU exposure, the dose delivered per MU by both linear accelerators was found to be within +/-2% for exposures larger than 4 MU. Beam flatness and symmetry also met accepted quality assurance standards for a minimum exposure of 4 MU. We have found that the performance of the two machines under study is well suited to the delivery of step-and-shoot IMRT. A system of dose calculation has also been commissioned for applying head scatter corrections to fields as small as 1x1 cm2. The accuracy and precision of the relative output calculations in water was validated for small fields and fields offset from the axis of collimator rotation. For both 6 and 18 MV x-ray beams, the dose per MU calculated in a water phantom agrees with measured data to within 1% on average, with a maximum deviation of 2.5%. The largest output factor discrepancies were seen when the actual radiation field size deviated from the set field size. The measured output in water can vary by as much 16% for 1x1 cm2 fields, when the measured field size deviates from the set field size by 2 mm. For a 1 mm deviation, this discrepancy was reduced to 8%. Steps should be taken to ensure collimator precision is tightly controlled when using such small fields. If this is not possible, very small fields should not contribute to a significant portion of the treatment, or uncertainties in the collimator position may effect the accuracy of the dose delivered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11190955     DOI: 10.1118/1.1328383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  9 in total

1.  Measurement and comparison of head scatter factor for 7 MV unflattened (FFF) and 6 MV flattened photon beam using indigenously designed columnar mini phantom.

Authors:  Sigamani Ashokkumar; Arunai Nambiraj; Sujit Nath Sinha; Girigesh Yadav; Kothanda Raman; Manindra Bhushan; Rajesh Thiyagarajan
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-03-01

2.  Optimized point dose measurement for monitor unit verification in intensity modulated radiation therapy using 6 MV photons by three different methodologies with different detector-phantom combinations: A comparative study.

Authors:  Biplab Sarkar; Bhaswar Ghosh; Sukumaran Mahendramohan; Ayan Basu; Jyotirup Goswami; Amitabh Ray
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2010-07

3.  Performance characterization of siemens primus linear accelerator under small monitor unit and small segments for the implementation of step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  P Reena; S Dayananda; Rajeshri Pai; S V Jamema; Tejpal Gupta; D Deepak; S Rajeev
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2006-10

4.  Dose linearity and uniformity of Siemens ONCOR impression plus linear accelerator designed for step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Janhavi R Bhangle; V K Sathiya Narayanan; Shrikant A Deshpande
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2007-07

5.  Implementation of a program for quality assurance on leaf positioning accuracy using Gafchromic(®) RTQA2 films.

Authors:  Andrea Girardi; Silvia Anglesio; Gianluca Amadore; Edoardo Trevisiol; Maria Grazia Ruo Redda
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2014-04

6.  Does gated beam delivery impact delivery accuracy on an Elekta linac?

Authors:  Mohammed Jermoumi; Roger Xie; Daliang Cao; David J Housley; David M Shepard
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Optimizing the MLC model parameters for IMRT in the RayStation treatment planning system.

Authors:  Shifeng Chen; Byong Yong Yi; Xiaocheng Yang; Huijun Xu; Karl L Prado; Warren D D'Souza
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Comparison of Head Scatter Factor for 6MV and 10MV flattened (FB) and Unflattened (FFF) Photon Beam using indigenously Designed Columnar Mini Phantom.

Authors:  Sigamani Ashokkumar; N Arunai Nambi Raj; Sujit Nath Sinha; Girigesh Yadav; Rajesh Thiyagarajan; Kothanda Raman; Manindra Bhushan Mishra
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2014-07

9.  SWIMRT: a graphical user interface using sliding window algorithm to construct a fluence map machine file.

Authors:  James C L Chow; Grigor N Grigorov; Nuri Yazdani
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 2.102

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.