Literature DB >> 11167050

A comparison of auditory and visual distraction effects: behavioral and event-related indices.

S Berti1, E Schröger.   

Abstract

Infrequent task-irrelevant deviations in the frequency of a tone may distract our attention away from the processing of task-relevant tone duration. The distraction obtained in the auditory paradigm is reflected in prolonged reaction times in duration discrimination and in P3a. The P3a is followed by a late negative component, which may be related to a re-orienting process following distraction (RON, re-orienting negativity). The present study aimed at comparing effects of the auditory and a corresponding visual distraction paradigm. Distraction elicited a deviance-related negativity which revealed a modality-specific distribution. It was followed by P3a (350-ms post-stimulus) and by RON (500-ms post-stimulus). RON did not occur with long-duration visual stimuli indicating a difference in visual and auditory distraction. Moreover, the results suggest that in both tasks irrelevant deviants were detected by modality-specific processes which caused an attention shift.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11167050     DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(00)00044-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  35 in total

1.  Top-down control over involuntary attention switching in the auditory modality.

Authors:  E Sussman; I Winkler; E Schröger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

2.  Auditory distraction in young and middle-aged adults: a behavioural and event-related potential study.

Authors:  R Mager; M Falkenstein; R Störmer; S Brand; F Müller-Spahn; A H Bullinger
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 3.  The cognitive determinants of behavioral distraction by deviant auditory stimuli: a review.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-21

4.  Sensory ERP effects in auditory distraction: did we miss the main event?

Authors:  János Horváth
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-08-04

5.  Preparation interval and cue utilization in the prevention of distraction.

Authors:  János Horváth
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Rethinking hyperactivity in pediatric ADHD: Preliminary evidence for a reconceptualization of hyperactivity/impulsivity from the perspective of informant perceptual processes.

Authors:  Michael J Kofler; Nicole B Groves; Leah J Singh; Elia F Soto; Elizabeth S M Chan; Lauren N Irwin; Caroline E Miller
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2020-06-01

7.  The integration of facial and vocal cues during emotional change perception: EEG markers.

Authors:  Xuhai Chen; Zhihui Pan; Ping Wang; Xiaohong Yang; Peng Liu; Xuqun You; Jiajin Yuan
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  The electrophysiological effect of working memory load on involuntary attention in an auditory-visual distraction paradigm: an ERP study.

Authors:  Jie-Yu Lv; Ting Wang; Jiang Qiu; Si-Hai Feng; Shen Tu; Dong-Tao Wei
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  A visual analog of mismatch negativity when stimuli differ in duration.

Authors:  M Y Khodanovich; E A Esipenko; M V Svetlik; E P Krutenkova
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-06-11

10.  Attention and working memory in elderly: the influence of a distracting environment.

Authors:  Pedro F S Rodrigues; Josefa N S Pandeirada
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2014-08-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.