Literature DB >> 11156821

Assessing the subjective experience of being a participant in psychiatric research.

R Marshall1, R Spitzer, S Vaughan, R Vaughan, L Mellman, R MacKinnon, S Roose.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To address both clinical and ethical concerns in psychiatric research, the study assessed the subjective experience of being a participant in a feasibility study of outcome in long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy and psychoanalysis.
METHOD: A questionnaire assessing positive and negative reactions to three typical research methodologies (self-report questionnaires, structured diagnostic interviews, and tape-recording of sessions) was administered to 23 patient-therapist pairs.
RESULTS: Patients reported that questionnaires and interviews were slightly to moderately helpful in promoting self-realization and facilitating therapy, and not at all to slightly intrusive and disruptive. Adjustment to audiotaping of sessions was rapid (within two sessions). Therapists significantly overestimated the negative effects and underestimated the positive benefit patients reported from participating in research.
CONCLUSIONS: Traditional objections to research in dynamic psychotherapy on the grounds that patients experience research procedures as significantly intrusive and disruptive appear to be unfounded.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11156821     DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.2.319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0002-953X            Impact factor:   18.112


  9 in total

1.  Is Participating in Psychological Research a Benefit, Burden, or Both for Medically Ill Youth and Their Caregivers?.

Authors:  Lori Wiener; Haven Battles; Sima Zadeh; Maryland Pao
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

2.  The acceptance of the K-SADS-PL - potential predictors for the overall satisfaction of parents and interviewers.

Authors:  Tina Matuschek; Sonia Jaeger; Stephanie Stadelmann; Katrin Dölling; Steffi Weis; Kai Von Klitzing; Madlen Grunewald; Andreas Hiemisch; Mirko Döhnert
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  Attitudes of patients with schizophrenia and depression to psychiatric research: a study in seven European countries.

Authors:  Ingo Schäfer; Tom Burns; W Wolfgang Fleischhacker; Silvana Galderisi; Janusz K Rybakowski; Jan Libiger; Wulf Rössler; Andrew Molodynski; Monika Edlinger; Giuseppe Piegari; Jela Hrnčiarova; Krystyna Gorna; Matthias Jaeger; Anne-Kathrin Fett; Johanna Hissbach; Dieter Naber
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 4.328

4.  The Challenges of Using Self-Report Measures with People with Severe Mental Illness: Four Participants' Experiences of the Research Process.

Authors:  Jennifer Bibb; Katrina Skewes McFerran
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2017-03-14

5.  Use of evidence-based assessment for childhood anxiety disorders in community practice.

Authors:  Stephen P H Whiteside; Adam F Sattler; Julie Hathaway; Kristin Vickers Douglas
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2016-02-27

Review 6.  Ethical issues in mental health research: the case for community engagement.

Authors:  James M Dubois; Brendolyn Bailey-Burch; Dan Bustillos; Jean Campbell; Linda Cottler; Celia B Fisher; Whitney B Hadley; Jinger G Hoop; Laura Roberts; Erica K Salter; Joan E Sieber; Richard D Stevenson
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychiatry       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.741

7.  Effect of Research Questionnaires on Satisfaction with Treatment Care in Suicidal Adolescents and their Parents.

Authors:  Samuel Lapalme-Remis; Claudine Tremblay-Jolicoeur; Rhonda Amsel; Melissa Henry; Brian Greenfield
Journal:  J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2011-05

8.  Involving patients with depression in research: survey of patients' attitudes to participation.

Authors:  Deborah Tallon; Jean Mulligan; Nicola Wiles; Laura Thomas; Tim J Peters; Rodney Elgie; Debbie Sharp; Glyn Lewis
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Inter-rater reliability and acceptance of the structured diagnostic interview for regulatory problems in infancy.

Authors:  Lukka Popp; Sabrina Fuths; Sabine Seehagen; Margarete Bolten; Mirja Gross-Hemmi; Dieter Wolke; Silvia Schneider
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 3.033

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.