Literature DB >> 28293800

The Challenges of Using Self-Report Measures with People with Severe Mental Illness: Four Participants' Experiences of the Research Process.

Jennifer Bibb1, Katrina Skewes McFerran2.   

Abstract

This study aimed to explore four mental health consumers' experiences of completing self-report outcome measures in a research project. Participants were recruited from a community mental health organisation in Melbourne and were interviewed upon completion of a mixed methods research study where they were asked to complete a series of self-report outcome measures. Descriptive phenomenological micro-analysis was used to analyse interview data and is presented along with the researchers' observations during the data collection process. Results revealed that participants found the outcome measures cognitively challenging and the language used in the measures did not support the empowering intentions of mental health recovery. The authors suggest that the value of completing surveys for people with severe mental illness needs to be carefully considered so that the research process does not diminish other benefits of participation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mental health recovery; Outcome measures; Qualitative research

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28293800     DOI: 10.1007/s10597-017-0127-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Community Ment Health J        ISSN: 0010-3853


  12 in total

1.  Psychological and social risks of behavioral research.

Authors:  Susan M Labott; Timothy P Johnson
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2004 May-Jun

2.  A critical interpretive synthesis of the most commonly used self-report measures in Australian mental health research.

Authors:  Jennifer Bibb; Felicity A Baker; Katrina Skewes McFerran
Journal:  Australas Psychiatry       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 1.369

3.  Suitability and utility of the CORE-OM and CORE-A for assessing severity of presenting problems in psychological therapy services based in primary and secondary care settings.

Authors:  Michael Barkham; Naomi Gilbert; Janice Connell; Chris Marshall; Elspeth Twigg
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.319

Review 4.  Emerging empirical evidence on the ethics of schizophrenia research.

Authors:  Laura B Dunn; Philip J Candilis; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 9.306

5.  The need to adapt standardized outcomes measures for community mental health.

Authors:  Catherine G Greeno; Courtney Colonna-Pydyn; Martha Shumway
Journal:  Soc Work Public Health       Date:  2007

6.  Assessing the subjective experience of being a participant in psychiatric research.

Authors:  R Marshall; R Spitzer; S Vaughan; R Vaughan; L Mellman; R MacKinnon; S Roose
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 18.112

7.  Developing a measure of sense of belonging.

Authors:  B M Hagerty; K Patusky
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Psychiatric outpatients report their experiences as participants in a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  M P Carey; D Morrison-Beedy; K B Carey; S A Maisto; C M Gordon; C T Pedlow
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.254

9.  Influences upon willingness to participate in schizophrenia research: an analysis of narrative data from 63 people with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Alexis Kaminsky; Laura Weiss Roberts; Janet L Brody
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2003

10.  Reflections on Researcher Identity and Power: The Impact of Positionality on Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR) Processes and Outcomes.

Authors:  Michael Muhammad; Nina Wallerstein; Andrew L Sussman; Magdalena Avila; Lorenda Belone; Bonnie Duran
Journal:  Crit Sociol (Eugene)       Date:  2014-05-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.