Literature DB >> 11152827

Intravascular ultrasound criteria for the assessment of the functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenoses and comparison with fractional flow reserve.

C Briguori1, A Anzuini, F Airoldi, G Gimelli, T Nishida, M Adamian, N Corvaja, C Di Mario, A Colombo.   

Abstract

The functional significance of coronary artery stenoses of intermediate severity is important in determining strategy in patient care. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is often used to evaluate coronary stenosis severity. However, at present, few data are available about the role IVUS in the assessment of functional significance of intermediate lesions. Myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) <0.75 is a reliable index of a functionally severe coronary stenosis. In 53 lesions we assessed (1) by pressure wire: FFR (index of functional significance), and (2) by IVUS: minimal lumen cross-sectional area (MLA, square millimeters), minimal lumen diameter (MLD, millimeters), lesion length (millimeters), and percent area stenosis at the lesion site. By regression analysis, percent area stenosis and lesion length had a significant inverse correlation with FFR (r = -0.58, p <0.001, r = -0.41, p <0.004, respectively). MLD and MLA showed a significant positive relation with FFR (r = 0.51, p <0.001, r = 0.41, p <0.004, respectively). By using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, we identified a percent area stenosis > 70% (sensitivity 100%, specificity 68%), a MLD < or = 1.8 mm (sensitivity 100%, specificity 66%), a MLA < or =4.0 mm2 (sensitivity 92%, specificity 56%), and a lesion length of >10 mm (sensitivity 41%, specificity 80%) to be the best cut-off values to fit with a FFR <0.75. The combined evaluation of both percent area stenosis and MLD made the IVUS examination more specific (sensitivity 100%, specificity 76%). In 53 intermediate coronary lesions found by angiography, IVUS area stenosis >70%, MLD < or =1.8 mm, MLA < or =4.0 mm2, and lesion length > 10 mm reliably identified functionally critical intermediate coronary stenoses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11152827     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01304-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  30 in total

1.  Optical coherence tomography criteria for defining functional severity of intermediate lesions: a comparative study with FFR.

Authors:  Tomasz Pawlowski; Francesco Prati; Tomasz Kulawik; Eleonora Ficarra; Jacek Bil; Robert Gil
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Intravascular imaging tools in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: comprehensive assessment of anatomy and physiology.

Authors:  Parham Eshtehardi; Jennifer Luke; Michael C McDaniel; Habib Samady
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 3.  A systematic review of imaging anatomy in predicting functional significance of coronary stenoses determined by fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Miao Chu; Neng Dai; Junqing Yang; Jelmer Westra; Shengxian Tu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Impact of plaque characteristics on the degree of functional stenosis.

Authors:  Pedro de Araújo Gonçalves; Alexandre Hideo-Kajita; Hector Manuel Garcia-Garcia
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-04

5.  Correlation between optical coherence tomography-derived intraluminal parameters and fractional flow reserve measurements in intermediate grade coronary lesions: a comparison between diabetic and non-diabetic patients.

Authors:  Sebastian Reith; Simone Battermann; Martin Hellmich; Nikolaus Marx; Mathias Burgmaier
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 6.  Use of intravascular imaging in managing coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Sanda Jegere; Inga Narbute; Andrejs Erglis
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-06-26

7.  Intra-coronary imaging modalities.

Authors:  Paul M Johnson; Jigar Patel; Michael Yeung; Prashant Kaul
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-05

8.  Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Andres Vasquez; Neville Mistry; Jasvindar Singh
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2014-08

9.  What is an appropriate reference standard in the quantitation of plaque surface area by intravascular coronary ultrasound?

Authors:  Charles L Laham; Matthew J McMahon; Michael S Chandra; Roy Venzon; Michael Jerin; Nicolas W Shammas
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2012-03

10.  Prospective, head-to-head comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, quantitative computed tomography angiography, and intravascular ultrasound for the prediction of hemodynamic significance in intermediate and severe lesions, using fractional flow reserve as reference standard (from the ATLANTA I and II Study).

Authors:  Szilard Voros; Sarah Rinehart; Jesus G Vazquez-Figueroa; Anna Kalynych; Dimitri Karmpaliotis; Zhen Qian; Parag H Joshi; Hunt Anderson; Laura Murrieta; Charles Wilmer; Harold Carlson; William Ballard; Charles Brown
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 2.778

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.