Literature DB >> 23449235

What is an appropriate reference standard in the quantitation of plaque surface area by intravascular coronary ultrasound?

Charles L Laham1, Matthew J McMahon, Michael S Chandra, Roy Venzon, Michael Jerin, Nicolas W Shammas.   

Abstract

We reevaluate the predictive accuracy of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-derived per cent plaque area stenosis (PAS) in significant coronary lesions (CLs) with or without proximal and distal reference vessel area adjustment. IVUS is valuable in defining moderate CL severity (30 to 70%) in left main (LM) or non-left main (NLM) coronaries using minimum luminal area (MLA) of ≤5.9 and ≤4 mm(2), respectively. Despite a strong correlation with severe CLs, PAS (≥ 70% for NLM and ≥67% for LM) remains underutilized because of confusion about an appropriate reference standard. We studied 120 patients with symptomatic moderate CLs (74 NLM, 46 LM) who underwent IVUS. In-lesion and adjusted PAS were derived by subtracting MLA from in-lesion and proximal or distal reference's external elastic membrane (EEM) area, respectively, divided by corresponding EEM area multiplied by 100. In-lesion PAS was correlated with MLA cutoffs of ≤5.9 and ≤7.5 mm(2) for LM and ≤4 mm(2) for NLM. Adjusted PAS strongly correlated with in-lesion PAS irrespective of reference segment (proximal reference, r = 0.879, p < 0.001; distal reference, r = 0.833, p < 0.001; mean proximal and distal reference, r = 0.896, p < 0.001). Considering MLA of ≤4 mm(2) (for NLM) and ≤5.9 mm(2) (for LM), in-lesion PAS of ≥70 and ≥67%, respectively, explained the majority of severe CLs but the sensitive LM MLA cutoff of ≤7.5 mm(2) showed higher predictive accuracy. Based on results, both in-lesion PAS and adjusted PAS can be used interchangeably and correlate strongly with MLA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coronary artery disease; intracoronary vascular ultrasound; minimum luminal area; per cent plaque area stenosis

Year:  2012        PMID: 23449235      PMCID: PMC3444038          DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1302435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Angiol        ISSN: 1061-1711


  15 in total

Review 1.  American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  G S Mintz; S E Nissen; W D Anderson; S R Bailey; R Erbel; P J Fitzgerald; F J Pinto; K Rosenfield; R J Siegel; E M Tuzcu; P G Yock
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: a randomized trial.

Authors:  G J Bech; B De Bruyne; N H Pijls; E D de Muinck; J C Hoorntje; J Escaned; P R Stella; E Boersma; J Bartunek; J J Koolen; W Wijns
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-06-19       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Physiological and intravascular ultrasound assessment of an ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis.

Authors:  Massoud A Leesar; Ronald Masden; Venu Jasti
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Assessment of intermediate severity coronary lesions in the catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  Jonathan Tobis; Babak Azarbal; Leo Slavin
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Clinical, intravascular ultrasound, and quantitative angiographic determinants of the coronary flow reserve before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  A Abizaid; G S Mintz; A D Pichard; K M Kent; L F Satler; C L Walsh; J J Popma; M B Leon
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Intravascular ultrasound-guided treatment for angiographically indeterminate left main coronary artery disease: a long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Amir-Ali Fassa; Kenji Wagatsuma; Stuart T Higano; Verghese Mathew; Gregory W Barsness; Ryan J Lennon; David R Holmes; Amir Lerman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-01-18       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Clinical validation of intravascular ultrasound imaging for assessment of coronary stenosis severity: comparison with stress myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  T Nishioka; A M Amanullah; H Luo; H Berglund; C J Kim; T Nagai; N Hakamata; S Katsushika; A Uehata; B Takase; K Isojima; D S Berman; R J Siegel
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Clinical potential of intravascular ultrasound for physiological assessment of coronary stenosis: relationship between quantitative ultrasound tomography and pressure-derived fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  A Takagi; Y Tsurumi; Y Ishii; K Suzuki; M Kawana; H Kasanuki
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-07-20       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Long-term follow-up after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was not performed based on intravascular ultrasound findings: importance of lumen dimensions.

Authors:  A S Abizaid; G S Mintz; R Mehran; A Abizaid; A J Lansky; A D Pichard; L F Satler; H Wu; C Pappas; K M Kent; M B Leon
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-07-20       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Correlations between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound in patients with an ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis.

Authors:  Venu Jasti; Eugen Ivan; Venkata Yalamanchili; Nattawut Wongpraparut; Massoud A Leesar
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-10-18       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.