Literature DB >> 11144994

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the electroencephalogram effects of scopolamine in healthy volunteers.

U Ebert1, M Grossmann, R Oertel, T Gramatté, W Kirch.   

Abstract

Scopolamine is a muscarinic receptor antagonist commonly used as a pharmacological model substance based on the "cholinergic hypothesis" of memory loss in senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. The objective of the study was to relate pharmacodynamic electroencephalogram (EEG) changes and scopolamine serum concentration using pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling techniques. This was a randomized, three-way crossover, open-label study involving 10 healthy nonsmoking young male volunteers who received either scopolamine 0.5 mg as an intravenous (i.v.) infusion over 15 minutes or an intramuscular (i.m.) injection or a placebo. The pharmacodynamic EEG measure consists of the total power in delta, theta, alpha, and beta bands over frontal, central, and occipital brain areas. The values of the pharmacokinetic parameters of scopolamine after i.v. infusion were clearance (CL) 205 +/- 36.6 L/h, volume of distribution (Vd) 363 +/- 66.7 L, distribution half-life (t1/2 alpha) 2.9 +/- 0.67 min, and terminal half-life (t1/2 beta) 105.4 +/- 9.94 min (mean +/- SEM). Mean peak serum concentrations (Cmax) were 4.66 and 0.96 ng/ml after i.v. and i.m. administration, respectively (p < 0.05). The area under the serum concentration versus time curve (AUC) after i.m. administration (81.27 +/- 11.21 ng/ml/min) was significantly lower compared to the value after i.v. infusion (157.28 +/- 30.86 ng/ml/min) (mean +/- SEM, p < 0.05). Absolute bioavailability of scopolamine after i.m. injection was 57% +/- 0.08% (mean +/- SEM). After both i.v. and i.m. administration, scopolamine induced a decrease in EEG alpha power (7.50-11.25 Hz) over frontal, central, and occipital brain areas compared to placebo (p < 0.05). The individual concentration-EEG effect relationships determined after i.v. infusion of scopolamine were successfully characterized by a sigmoidal Emax model. The averaged values of the pharmacodynamic parameters were E0 = 0.58 microV2, Emax = 0.29 microV2, EC50 = 0.60 ng/ml, and gamma = 1.17. No time delay between serum concentrations and changes in alpha power was observed, indicating a rapid equilibration between serum and effect site. The results provide the first demonstration of a direct correlation between serum concentrations of scopolamine and changes in total power in alpha frequency band in healthy volunteers using PK-PD modeling techniques. As regards the effect on the EEG, 0.5 mg of scopolamine administered i.v. appears to be a suitable dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11144994     DOI: 10.1177/00912700122009836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0091-2700            Impact factor:   3.126


  20 in total

1.  Influence of ocular filtering in EEG data on the assessment of drug-induced effects on the brain.

Authors:  Sergio Romero; Miguel A Mañanas; Manel J Barbanoj
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Hippocampal M1 receptor function associated with spatial learning and memory in aged female rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Gwendolen E Haley; Chris Kroenke; Daniel Schwartz; Steven G Kohama; Henryk F Urbanski; Jacob Raber
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2010-10-02

3.  Antidepressant efficacy of the antimuscarinic drug scopolamine: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Maura L Furey; Wayne C Drevets
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2006-10

4.  Model-based exposure-response analysis to quantify age related differences in the response to scopolamine in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Ricardo Alvarez-Jimenez; Geert Jan Groeneveld; Joop M A van Gerven; Sebastiaan C Goulooze; Anne Catrien Baakman; Justin L Hay; Jasper Stevens
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  The scopolamine model as a pharmacodynamic marker in early drug development.

Authors:  Robert A Lenz; Jeffrey D Baker; Charles Locke; Lynne E Rueter; Eric G Mohler; Keith Wesnes; Walid Abi-Saab; Mario D Saltarelli
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of central nervous system effects of scopolamine in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Marieke Liem-Moolenaar; Peter de Boer; Maarten Timmers; Rik C Schoemaker; J G Coen van Hasselt; Stephan Schmidt; Joop M A van Gerven
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Replication of scopolamine's antidepressant efficacy in major depressive disorder: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Wayne C Drevets; Maura L Furey
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 8.  Antidepressant effects of the muscarinic cholinergic receptor antagonist scopolamine: a review.

Authors:  Wayne C Drevets; Carlos A Zarate; Maura L Furey
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 13.382

9.  Effects of dimethylaminoethanol pyroglutamate (DMAE p-Glu) against memory deficits induced by scopolamine: evidence from preclinical and clinical studies.

Authors:  Olivier Blin; Christine Audebert; Séverine Pitel; Arthur Kaladjian; Catherine Casse-Perrot; Mohammed Zaim; Joelle Micallef; Jacky Tisne-Versailles; Pierre Sokoloff; Philippe Chopin; Marc Marien
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Selective effects of cholinergic modulation on task performance during selective attention.

Authors:  Maura L Furey; Pietro Pietrini; James V Haxby; Wayne C Drevets
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 7.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.