Wayne C Drevets1, Maura L Furey. 1. Mood and Anxiety Disorders Program, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We previously reported that intravenous (IV) scopolamine administration produced rapid and robust antidepressant effects in a sample consisting of both unipolar and bipolar depressives. The present study aimed to replicate this finding in an independent sample limited to unipolar depressives. METHODS:Outpatients with major depressive disorder (MDD; n = 23; 22 were included in analyses) participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Subjects were randomized into either a P/S or S/P sequence (P = block of three placebo sessions; S = block of three scopolamine sessions; [4.0 microg/kg IV]). Sessions occurred 3 to 5 days apart, such that time spent in each block lasted 1.5 to 2 weeks and the interval between blocks was 3 to 5 days. The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) served as the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: Following the initial block, the group receiving scopolamine first (S/P) showed a 32% reduction in MADRS scores (p < .001), which exceeded the corresponding change of 6.5% under placebo (P/S; p = .009), confirming the a-priori hypothesis. Improvement was significant at the first evaluation that followed scopolamine administration (p = .011). In Block 2, the P/S group showed a 53% reduction in MADRS scores (p = .001) following scopolamine versus placebo, whereas the reduction seen in S/P subjects who received scopolamine during Block 1 persisted as they received placebo during Block 2. Scopolamine induced drowsiness, blurred vision, dry mouth, light-headedness, and reduced blood pressure, which were sufficiently well tolerated that no subject dropped out because of side effects. CONCLUSIONS: These results replicate previous finding that scopolamine produces a rapid and robust antidepressant response. Published by Elsevier Inc.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: We previously reported that intravenous (IV) scopolamine administration produced rapid and robust antidepressant effects in a sample consisting of both unipolar and bipolar depressives. The present study aimed to replicate this finding in an independent sample limited to unipolar depressives. METHODS: Outpatients with major depressive disorder (MDD; n = 23; 22 were included in analyses) participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Subjects were randomized into either a P/S or S/P sequence (P = block of three placebo sessions; S = block of three scopolamine sessions; [4.0 microg/kg IV]). Sessions occurred 3 to 5 days apart, such that time spent in each block lasted 1.5 to 2 weeks and the interval between blocks was 3 to 5 days. The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) served as the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: Following the initial block, the group receiving scopolamine first (S/P) showed a 32% reduction in MADRS scores (p < .001), which exceeded the corresponding change of 6.5% under placebo (P/S; p = .009), confirming the a-priori hypothesis. Improvement was significant at the first evaluation that followed scopolamine administration (p = .011). In Block 2, the P/S group showed a 53% reduction in MADRS scores (p = .001) following scopolamine versus placebo, whereas the reduction seen in S/P subjects who received scopolamine during Block 1 persisted as they received placebo during Block 2. Scopolamine induced drowsiness, blurred vision, dry mouth, light-headedness, and reduced blood pressure, which were sufficiently well tolerated that no subject dropped out because of side effects. CONCLUSIONS: These results replicate previous finding that scopolamine produces a rapid and robust antidepressant response. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Kaviraja Udupa; T N Sathyaprabha; Jagadisha Thirthalli; K R Kishore; T R Raju; B N Gangadhar Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2007-05-08 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: R M Berman; A Cappiello; A Anand; D A Oren; G R Heninger; D S Charney; J H Krystal Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2000-02-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: D N Klein; A F Schatzberg; J P McCullough; F Dowling; D Goodman; R H Howland; J C Markowitz; C Smith; M E Thase; A J Rush; L LaVange; W M Harrison; M B Keller Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: J H Krystal; G Sanacora; H Blumberg; A Anand; D S Charney; G Marek; C N Epperson; A Goddard; G F Mason Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2002 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Charles F Reynolds; Meryl A Butters; Oscar Lopez; Bruce G Pollock; Mary Amanda Dew; Benoit H Mulsant; Eric J Lenze; Margo Holm; Joan C Rogers; Sati Mazumdar; Patricia R Houck; Amy Begley; Stewart Anderson; Jordan F Karp; Mark D Miller; Ellen M Whyte; Jacqueline Stack; Ariel Gildengers; Katalin Szanto; Salem Bensasi; Daniel I Kaufer; M Ilyas Kamboh; Steven T DeKosky Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2011-01
Authors: Eric J Lenze; Nuri B Farber; Evan Kharasch; Julie Schweiger; Michael Yingling; John Olney; John W Newcomer Journal: World J Biol Psychiatry Date: 2016-02-26 Impact factor: 4.132