Literature DB >> 27273555

Model-based exposure-response analysis to quantify age related differences in the response to scopolamine in healthy subjects.

Ricardo Alvarez-Jimenez1, Geert Jan Groeneveld2,3, Joop M A van Gerven2,4, Sebastiaan C Goulooze2,5, Anne Catrien Baakman2, Justin L Hay2, Jasper Stevens2.   

Abstract

AIM: Subjects with increasing age are more sensitive to the effects of the anti-muscarinic agent scopolamine, which is used (among other indications) to induce temporary cognitive dysfunction in early phase drug studies with cognition enhancing compounds. The enhanced sensitivity has always been attributed to incipient cholinergic neuronal dysfunction, as a part of the normal aging process. The aim of the study was to correlate age-dependent pharmacodynamic neuro-physiologic effects of scopolamine after correcting for differences in individual exposure.
METHODS: We applied a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modelling approach to describe individual exposure and neurocognitive effects of intravenous scopolamine administration in healthy subjects.
RESULTS: A two-compartment linear kinetics model best described the plasma concentrations of scopolamine. The estimated scopolamine population mean apparent central and peripheral volume of distribution was 2.66 ± 1.050 l and 62.10 ± 10.100 l, respectively and the clearance was 1.09 ± 0.096 l min(-1) . Age was not related to a decrease of performance in the tests following scopolamine administration in older subjects. Only the saccadic peak velocity showed a positive correlation between age and sensitivity to scopolamine. Age was, however, correlated at baseline with an estimated slower reaction time while performing the cognitive tests and to higher global δ and frontal θ frequency bands measured with the surface EEG.
CONCLUSIONS: Most of the differences in response to scopolamine administration between young and older subjects could be explained by pharmacokinetic differences (lower clearance) and not to an enhanced sensitivity when corrected for exposure levels.
© 2016 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NONMEM; ageing; cholinergic dysfunction; healthy subjects; pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling; scopolamine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27273555      PMCID: PMC5137826          DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  37 in total

1.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  In vivo muscarinic cholinergic receptor imaging in human brain with [11C]scopolamine and positron emission tomography.

Authors:  K A Frey; R A Koeppe; G K Mulholland; D Jewett; R Hichwa; R L Ehrenkaufer; J E Carey; D M Wieland; D E Kuhl; B W Agranoff
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 6.200

3.  Changes in cortical slow wave activity in healthy aging.

Authors:  Vera Maria Leirer; Christian Wienbruch; Stephan Kolassa; Winfried Schlee; Thomas Elbert; Iris-Tatjana Kolassa
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.978

4.  Model-based exposure-response analysis to quantify age related differences in the response to scopolamine in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Ricardo Alvarez-Jimenez; Geert Jan Groeneveld; Joop M A van Gerven; Sebastiaan C Goulooze; Anne Catrien Baakman; Justin L Hay; Jasper Stevens
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in clinical use of scopolamine.

Authors:  Ulf D Renner; Reinhard Oertel; Wilhelm Kirch
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.681

6.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the electroencephalogram effects of scopolamine in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  U Ebert; M Grossmann; R Oertel; T Gramatté; W Kirch
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.126

7.  Bioavailability of intranasal scopolamine in normal subjects.

Authors:  L Putcha; K J Tietze; D W Bourne; C M Parise; R P Hunter; N M Cintrón
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 8.  The cholinergic hypothesis of cognitive aging revisited again: cholinergic functional compensation.

Authors:  Julie A Dumas; Paul A Newhouse
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 3.533

9.  Specific impairments in visuospatial working and short-term memory following low-dose scopolamine challenge in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Elizabeth Thomas; Peter J Snyder; Robert H Pietrzak; Colleen E Jackson; Martin Bednar; Paul Maruff
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Modelling dementia: effects of scopolamine on memory and attention.

Authors:  P Broks; G C Preston; M Traub; P Poppleton; C Ward; S M Stahl
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  11 in total

1.  Neuroprotective effects of matrine on scopolamine-induced amnesia via inhibition of AChE/BuChE and oxidative stress.

Authors:  Kaiyue Sun; Yuting Bai; Rong Zhao; Zijiao Guo; Xiang Su; Peiqi Li; Pengyu Yang
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.584

2.  Model-based exposure-response analysis to quantify age related differences in the response to scopolamine in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Ricardo Alvarez-Jimenez; Geert Jan Groeneveld; Joop M A van Gerven; Sebastiaan C Goulooze; Anne Catrien Baakman; Justin L Hay; Jasper Stevens
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  How publication guidelines for clinical pharmacology trials may help to accelerate knowledge transfer.

Authors:  Arne Ring; Kerstin Breithaupt-Grögler
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Neuroprotection of SAK3 on scopolamine-induced cholinergic dysfunction in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells.

Authors:  Nopparat Suthprasertporn; Nopparada Mingchinda; Kohji Fukunaga; Wipawan Thangnipon
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 5.  The role of sex, age and genetic polymorphisms of CYP enzymes on the pharmacokinetics of anticholinergic drugs.

Authors:  Shanna C Trenaman; Susan K Bowles; Melissa K Andrew; Kerry Goralski
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2021-05

6.  Neuroprotection of N-benzylcinnamide on scopolamine-induced cholinergic dysfunction in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells.

Authors:  Nicha Puangmalai; Wipawan Thangnipon; Rungtip Soi-Ampornkul; Nirut Suwanna; Patoomratana Tuchinda; Saksit Nobsathian
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.135

7.  No synergistic effect of subtherapeutic doses of donepezil and EVP-6124 in healthy elderly subjects in a scopolamine challenge model.

Authors:  Anne Catrien Baakman; Ricardo Alvarez-Jimenez; Gordon Loewen; Marieke L de Kam; Karen Broekhuizen; Dana C Hilt; Geert Jan Groeneveld
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2019-04-01

8.  EEG machine learning for accurate detection of cholinergic intervention and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Sonja Simpraga; Ricardo Alvarez-Jimenez; Huibert D Mansvelder; Joop M A van Gerven; Geert Jan Groeneveld; Simon-Shlomo Poil; Klaus Linkenkaer-Hansen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Anticholinesterase and Antioxidant Potential of Hydromethanolic Extract of Ziziphus mucronata (Rhamnaceae) Leaves on Scopolamine-Induced Memory and Cognitive Dysfunctions in Mice.

Authors:  Harquin Simplice Foyet; Eglantine Keugong Wado; Hervé Hervé Ngatanko Abaissou; Emmanuel Acha Assongalem; Oben Kenneth Eyong
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.629

10.  Biperiden Challenge Model in Healthy Elderly as Proof-of-Pharmacology Tool: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Charlotte Bakker; Michiel J van Esdonk; Rik F E Stuurman; Laura G J M Borghans; Marieke L de Kam; Joop M A van Gerven; Geert Jan Groeneveld
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 3.126

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.