Literature DB >> 21306419

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of central nervous system effects of scopolamine in healthy subjects.

Marieke Liem-Moolenaar1, Peter de Boer, Maarten Timmers, Rik C Schoemaker, J G Coen van Hasselt, Stephan Schmidt, Joop M A van Gerven.   

Abstract

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: • The cholinergic system is important for different central nervous system functions, including memory, learning and attention. Scopolamine, a centrally active muscarinic antagonist, has been used to model dementia and to demonstrate the pharmacological effects of cholinergic drugs, but for most effects the concentration-effect relationships are unknown. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: • We determined the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of scopolamine using a multidimensional central nervous system test battery in a large group of healthy volunteers. The results suggested there are various functional cholinergic systems with different pharmacological characteristics, which can be used to study the effects of drugs that directly or indirectly modify cholinergic systems. The design of such studies should take the different concentration-effect relationships into account. AIM(S) Although scopolamine is a frequently used memory impairment model, the relationships between exposure and corresponding central nervous system (CNS) effects are mostly unknown. The aim of our study was to characterize these using pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modelling.
METHODS: In two double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-way crossover studies, 0.5-mg scopolamine was administered i.v. to 90 healthy male subjects. PK and PD/safety measures were monitored pre-dose and up to 8.5 h after administration. PK-PD relationships were modelled using non-linear mixed-effect modelling.
RESULTS: Most PD responses following scopolamine administration in 85 subjects differed significantly from placebo. As PD measures lagged behind the plasma PK profile, PK-PD relationships were modelled using an effect compartment and arbitrarily categorized according to their equilibration half-lives (t(1/2) k(eo) ; hysteresis measure). t(1/2) k(eo) for heart rate was 17 min, saccadic eye movements and adaptive tracking 1-1.5 h, body sway, smooth pursuit, visual analogue scales alertness and psychedelic 2.5-3.5 h, pupil size, finger tapping and visual analogue scales feeling high more than 8 h.
CONCLUSIONS: Scopolamine affected different CNS functions in a concentration-dependent manner, which based on their distinct PK-PD characteristics seemed to reflect multiple distinct functional pathways of the cholinergic system. All PD effects showed considerable albeit variable delays compared with plasma concentrations. The t(1/2) k(eo) of the central effects was longer than of the peripheral effects on heart rate, which at least partly reflects the long CNS retention of scopolamine, but possibly also the triggering of independent secondary mechanisms. PK-PD analysis can optimize scopolamine administration regimens for future research and give insight into the physiology and pharmacology of human cholinergic systems.
© 2011 Centre for Human Drug Research. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology © 2011 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21306419      PMCID: PMC3099375          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.03936.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  57 in total

1.  The sensitivity of pharmacodynamic tests for the central nervous system effects of drugs on the effects of sleep deprivation.

Authors:  A L van Steveninck; B N van Berckel; R C Schoemaker; D D Breimer; J M van Gerven; A F Cohen
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.153

Review 2.  Basic concepts of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling.

Authors:  B Meibohm; H Derendorf
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.366

Review 3.  Further evidence for the cholinergic hypothesis of aging and dementia from the canine model of aging.

Authors:  Joseph A Araujo; Christa M Studzinski; Norton W Milgram
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.067

Review 4.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in clinical use of scopolamine.

Authors:  Ulf D Renner; Reinhard Oertel; Wilhelm Kirch
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.681

5.  The effects of the glycine reuptake inhibitor R213129 on the central nervous system and on scopolamine-induced impairments in psychomotor and cognitive function in healthy subjects.

Authors:  M Liem-Moolenaar; R W M Zoethout; P de Boer; M Schmidt; M L de Kam; A F Cohen; K L Franson; J M A van Gerven
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 4.153

6.  Muscarinic and nicotinic receptor modulation of object and spatial n-back working memory in humans.

Authors:  Amity Green; Kathryn A Ellis; Julia Ellis; Cali F Bartholomeusz; Susan Ilic; Rodney J Croft; K Luan Phan; Pradeep J Nathan
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  Integrated pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of Ro 48-6791, a new benzodiazepine, in comparison with midazolam during first administration to healthy male subjects.

Authors:  J Dingemanse; J M van Gerven; R C Schoemaker; G Roncari; J J Oberyé; M F van Oostenbruggen; J Massarella; P Segala; M Zell; A F Cohen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Integrated pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of Ro 48-8684, a new benzodiazepine, in comparison with midazolam during first administration to healthy male subjects.

Authors:  J M van Gerven; G Roncari; R C Schoemaker; J Massarella; P Keesmaat; H Kooyman; P Heizmann; M Zell; A F Cohen; J Dingemanse
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of scopolamine after subcutaneous administration.

Authors:  U Ebert; M Siepmann; R Oertel; K A Wesnes; W Kirch
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.126

Review 10.  Scopolamine model of dementia: electroencephalogram findings and cognitive performance.

Authors:  U Ebert; W Kirch
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.686

View more
  17 in total

1.  Understanding the hysteresis loop conundrum in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships.

Authors:  Christopher Louizos; Jaime A Yáñez; M Laird Forrest; Neal M Davies
Journal:  J Pharm Pharm Sci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.327

2.  Model-based exposure-response analysis to quantify age related differences in the response to scopolamine in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Ricardo Alvarez-Jimenez; Geert Jan Groeneveld; Joop M A van Gerven; Sebastiaan C Goulooze; Anne Catrien Baakman; Justin L Hay; Jasper Stevens
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  An anti-nicotinic cognitive challenge model using mecamylamine in comparison with the anti-muscarinic cognitive challenge using scopolamine.

Authors:  Anne Catrien Baakman; Ricardo Alvarez-Jimenez; Robert Rissmann; Erica S Klaassen; Jasper Stevens; Sebastiaan C Goulooze; Jeroen C G den Burger; Eleonora L Swart; Joop M A van Gerven; Geert Jan Groeneveld
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Multiple-Ascending Dose Study in Healthy Subjects to Assess the Pharmacokinetics, Tolerability, and CYP3A4 Interaction Potential of the T-Type Calcium Channel Blocker ACT-709478, A Potential New Antiepileptic Drug.

Authors:  Muriel Richard; Priska Kaufmann; Marion Ort; Rüdiger Kornberger; Jasper Dingemanse
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 5.749

5.  The muscarinic antagonists scopolamine and atropine are competitive antagonists at 5-HT3 receptors.

Authors:  Martin Lochner; Andrew J Thompson
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.250

6.  Endogenous in-session cortisol during exposure therapy predicts symptom improvement: Preliminary results from a scopolamine-augmentation trial.

Authors:  Kate R Kuhlman; Michael Treanor; Gabriella Imbriano; Michelle G Craske
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 4.905

7.  Why an M1 Antagonist Could Be a More Selective Model for Memory Impairment than Scopolamine.

Authors:  Arjan Blokland; Anke Sambeth; Jos Prickaerts; Wim J Riedel
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  No synergistic effect of subtherapeutic doses of donepezil and EVP-6124 in healthy elderly subjects in a scopolamine challenge model.

Authors:  Anne Catrien Baakman; Ricardo Alvarez-Jimenez; Gordon Loewen; Marieke L de Kam; Karen Broekhuizen; Dana C Hilt; Geert Jan Groeneveld
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2019-04-01

9.  Time related effects on functional brain connectivity after serotonergic and cholinergic neuromodulation.

Authors:  Bernadet L Klaassens; Serge A R B Rombouts; Anderson M Winkler; Helene C van Gorsel; Jeroen van der Grond; Joop M A van Gerven
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  EEG machine learning for accurate detection of cholinergic intervention and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Sonja Simpraga; Ricardo Alvarez-Jimenez; Huibert D Mansvelder; Joop M A van Gerven; Geert Jan Groeneveld; Simon-Shlomo Poil; Klaus Linkenkaer-Hansen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.