Literature DB >> 17534379

Selective effects of cholinergic modulation on task performance during selective attention.

Maura L Furey1, Pietro Pietrini, James V Haxby, Wayne C Drevets.   

Abstract

The cholinergic neurotransmitter system is critically linked to cognitive functions including attention. The current studies were designed to evaluate the effect of a cholinergic agonist and an antagonist on performance during a selective visual attention task where the inherent salience of attended/unattended stimuli was modulated. Two randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover studies were performed, one (n=9) with the anticholinesterase physostigmine (1.0 mg/h), and the other (n=30) with the anticholinergic scopolamine (0.4 mc/kg). During the task, two double-exposure pictures of faces and houses were presented side by side. Subjects were cued to attend to either the face or the house component of the stimuli, and were instructed to perform a matching task with the two exemplars from the attended category. The cue changed every 4-7 trials to instruct subjects to shift attention from one stimulus component to the other. During placebo in both studies, reaction time (RT) associated with the first trial following a cued shift in attention was longer than RT associated with later trials (p<0.05); RT also was significantly longer when attending to houses than to faces (p<0.05). Physostigmine decreased RT relative to placebo preferentially during trials greater than one (p<0.05), with no change during trial one; and decreased RT preferentially during the attention to houses condition (p<0.05) vs attention to faces. Scopolamine increased RT relative to placebo selectively during trials greater than one (p<0.05), and preferentially increased RT during the attention to faces condition (p<0.05). The results suggest that enhancement or impairment of cholinergic activity preferentially influences the maintenance of selective attention (ie trials greater than 1). Moreover, effects of cholinergic manipulation depend on the selective attention condition (ie faces vs houses), which may suggest that cholinergic activity interacts with stimulus salience. The findings are discussed within the context of the role of acetylcholine both in stimulus processing and stimulus salience, and in establishing attention biases through top-down and bottom-up mechanisms of attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17534379      PMCID: PMC3250310          DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology        ISSN: 0893-133X            Impact factor:   7.853


  51 in total

Review 1.  Cortical cholinergic inputs mediating arousal, attentional processing and dreaming: differential afferent regulation of the basal forebrain by telencephalic and brainstem afferents.

Authors:  M Sarter; J P Bruno
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Interacting roles of attention and visual salience in V4.

Authors:  John H Reynolds; Robert Desimone
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Neurodynamics of biased competition and cooperation for attention: a model with spiking neurons.

Authors:  Gustavo Deco; Edmund T Rolls
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Visual attention as a multilevel selection process.

Authors:  Sabine Kastner; Mark A Pinsk
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Faces retain attention.

Authors:  Markus Bindemann; A Mike Burton; Ignace T C Hooge; Rob Jenkins; Edward H F de Haan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12

6.  Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory-guided visual search.

Authors:  L Chelazzi; J Duncan; E K Miller; R Desimone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 8.  Unraveling the attentional functions of cortical cholinergic inputs: interactions between signal-driven and cognitive modulation of signal detection.

Authors:  Martin Sarter; Michael E Hasselmo; John P Bruno; Ben Givens
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2005-02

9.  A functional role of cholinergic innervation to neurons in the cat visual cortex.

Authors:  H Sato; Y Hata; H Masui; T Tsumoto
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Visual attention mediated by biased competition in extrastriate visual cortex.

Authors:  R Desimone
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  46 in total

Review 1.  The role of neuromodulators in selective attention.

Authors:  Behrad Noudoost; Tirin Moore
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Synergistic effects of genetic variation in nicotinic and muscarinic receptors on visual attention but not working memory.

Authors:  P M Greenwood; M-K Lin; R Sundararajan; K J Fryxell; R Parasuraman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Cholinergic modulation of cognition: insights from human pharmacological functional neuroimaging.

Authors:  Paul Bentley; Jon Driver; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 11.685

4.  Prefrontal beta2 subunit-containing and alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors differentially control glutamatergic and cholinergic signaling.

Authors:  Vinay Parikh; Jinzhao Ji; Michael W Decker; Martin Sarter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Cortical afferent inhibition abnormalities reveal cholinergic dysfunction in Parkinson's disease: a reappraisal.

Authors:  Raffaele Nardone; Francesco Brigo; Viviana Versace; Yvonne Höller; Frediano Tezzon; Leopold Saltuari; Eugen Trinka; Luca Sebastianelli
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  The prominent role of stimulus processing: cholinergic function and dysfunction in cognition.

Authors:  Maura L Furey
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.710

Review 7.  Estrogen therapy and cognition: a review of the cholinergic hypothesis.

Authors:  Robert B Gibbs
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 19.871

8.  Cholinergic enhancement reduces functional connectivity and BOLD variability in visual extrastriate cortex during selective attention.

Authors:  Emiliano Ricciardi; Giacomo Handjaras; Giulio Bernardi; Pietro Pietrini; Maura L Furey
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 5.250

9.  Cholinergic enhancement eliminates modulation of neural activity by task difficulty in the prefrontal cortex during working memory.

Authors:  Maura L Furey; Emiliano Ricciardi; Mark B Schapiro; Stanley I Rapoport; Pietro Pietrini
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 10.  Attention: oscillations and neuropharmacology.

Authors:  Gustavo Deco; Alexander Thiele
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.