Literature DB >> 11139710

[Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy: short-term results and complications in 83 patients].

M Cosson1, E Bogaert, F Narducci, D Querleu, G Crépin.   

Abstract

We retrospectively studied 77 laparoscopic sacral colpopexies performed from June 1996 to May 1998. Suspension was reinforced with two strips of synthetic mesh. Five patients had previously undergone hysterectomy and 4 others had experienced failure of surgery for prolapse of the uterus. Laparoscopy was performed in 83 women with symptomatic prolapse of the uterus. Six cases required conversion to laparotomy because of technical difficulties. All other 77 patients underwent laparoscopic sacropexy using anterior and posterior mesh reinforcement. Subtotal laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated in 60 cases, laparoscopic Burch colposuspension in 74 and levator myorraphy using the vaginal approach in 55. Operative time decreased from 292 to 180 minutes as the surgeon gained experience. The main operative complications were one rectal and two bladder injuries. Three patients required reoperations for haematoma or hemorrhage. One patient complained of chronic inflammation of the cervix and another experienced rejection of the posterior mesh 6 months after the operation. Mean follow up was 343 days. Three other patients required reoperation: one for a 3(rd) degree cystocele and two for recurrent stress incontinence. The conclusion of this study is that laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is feasible. Operative time and postoperative complications are related to the surgeon's experience but remain comparable to those noted in laparotomy. Long term assessment is required to confirm the results of this procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11139710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)        ISSN: 0150-9918


  14 in total

1.  [Prolapse surgery].

Authors:  K P Jünemann; M Hamann; C Seif
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Current status of robotics in female urology and gynecology.

Authors:  Daniel S Elliott; George K Chow; Matthew Gettman
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for uterine and post-hysterectomy prolapse: anatomical results, quality of life and perioperative outcome-a prospective study with 101 cases.

Authors:  Dimitri Sarlos; Sonja Brandner; LaVonne Kots; Nicolle Gygax; Gabriel Schaer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-06-07

4.  Laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament fixation for uterovaginal prolapse: experience with 93 cases.

Authors:  Yanzhou Wang; Dan Wang; Yuyan Li; Zhiqing Liang; Huicheng Xu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with a minimum of three years follow-up.

Authors:  Mark S Shimko; Eric C Umbreit; George K Chow; Daniel S Elliott
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-01-19

6.  Sacral colpopexy: long-term mesh complications requiring reoperation(s).

Authors:  Emmanuelle Arsene; Géraldine Giraudet; Jean-Philippe Lucot; Chrystèle Rubod; Michel Cosson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Long-term outcomes after totally robotic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  A Germain; F Thibault; M Galifet; M-L Scherrer; A Ayav; J Hubert; L Brunaud; L Bresler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  [Vaginal pelvic repair. Always with mesh or not?].

Authors:  H Loertzer; R H Ringert; A Fechner; P Thelen; C Kümmel; A Strauss
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Mesh erosion following abdominal sacral colpopexy in the absence and presence of the cervical stump.

Authors:  Shimon Ginath; Alan D Garely; Alexander Condrea; Michael D Vardy
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and learning curve.

Authors:  Mohamed N Akl; Jaime B Long; Dobie L Giles; Jeffrey L Cornella; Paul D Pettit; Anita H Chen; Paul M Magtibay
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.