Literature DB >> 27637704

Long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with a minimum of three years follow-up.

Mark S Shimko1, Eric C Umbreit1, George K Chow1, Daniel S Elliott2.   

Abstract

We describe efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted laparoscopic vaginal vault prolapse repair with long-term follow-up. We reviewed the records of 40 consecutive patients with posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse who underwent a robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy at our institution between September 2002 and September 2006. Patient analysis focused on complications, patient satisfaction, and morbidity, with a minimum of 36 months' follow-up. Median follow-up was 62 months (range 36-84) and mean age was 67 (43-83) years. Mean operating time was 3.1 (2.15-5) h with a median operating time of 2.9 h. All but four were discharged home on postoperative day one; three patients left on postoperative day two and one left on postoperative day seven. Three developed recurrent grade 3-4 rectoceles and two vaginal extrusion of mesh. Thirty-eight of the 40 patients (95%) were satisfied with their outcome. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is a minimally invasive technique for vaginal vault prolapse repair, combining the advantages of open sacrocolpopexy with the decreased morbidity of laparoscopy. We found a short hospital stay, low complication rates, and high patient satisfaction with a minimum of 3 years' follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopy; Robotic; Sacrocolpopexy; Vaginal vault prolapse

Year:  2011        PMID: 27637704     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-011-0244-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  27 in total

1.  Does robotic assistance improve efficiency in performing complex minimally invasive surgical procedures?

Authors:  Shiva Jayaraman; Douglas Quan; Ibrahim Al-Ghamdi; Firas El-Deen; Christopher M Schlachta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; Fikre Wang; James R Korndorffer; J Bruce Dunne; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  Daniel S Elliott; Amy E Krambeck; George K Chow
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Laparoscopic colposuspension for total vaginal prolapse.

Authors:  A Ostrzenski
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.561

5.  Obesity and urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  P L Dwyer; E T Lee; D M Hay
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1988-01

6.  Abdominal approach to vaginal eversion.

Authors:  W A Addison; M C Timmons
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.190

7.  Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy approach for genito-urinary prolapse: experience with 363 cases.

Authors:  Francois Rozet; Eric Mandron; Carlos Arroyo; Henry Andrews; Xavier Cathelineau; Annick Mombet; Nathalie Cathala; Guy Vallancien
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation.

Authors:  J T Benson; V Lucente; E McClellan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Abdominal sacral colpoperineopexy: a new approach for correction of posterior compartment defects and perineal descent associated with vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  G W Cundiff; R L Harris; K Coates; V H Low; R C Bump; W A Addison
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Short-term and long-term follow-up of abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: initial experience in a district general hospital.

Authors:  K Reddy; T G Malik
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.246

View more
  5 in total

1.  Single-center study for robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacropexies: a one-fits-all strategy for pelvic organ prolapse?

Authors:  Pawel Mach; Cara Kaufold; Peter Rusch; Rainer Kimmig; Paul Buderath
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Long-term outcomes of robotic mesh sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Karen Jong; Ted Klein; Philippe E Zimmern
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-10-04

3.  Robotic Sacrocolpopexy for Treatment of Apical Compartment Prolapse.

Authors:  Kwang Jin Ko; Kyu-Sung Lee
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 4.  Long-term mesh erosion rate following abdominal robotic reconstructive pelvic floor surgery: a prospective study and overview of the literature.

Authors:  Femke van Zanten; Jan J van Iersel; Tim J C Paulides; Paul M Verheijen; Ivo A M J Broeders; Esther C J Consten; Egbert Lenters; Steven E Schraffordt Koops
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiang Yang; Yong He; Xiaoyi Zhang; Zhi Wang; Xiaohu Zuo; Likun Gao; Li Hong
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.