Literature DB >> 25323309

Sacral colpopexy: long-term mesh complications requiring reoperation(s).

Emmanuelle Arsene1, Géraldine Giraudet, Jean-Philippe Lucot, Chrystèle Rubod, Michel Cosson.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Sacral colpopexy (SC) is a classic procedure used for the surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Although the procedure boasts excellent success rates, there are risks of complications and reoperation may be required. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the extent of complications following SC, requiring reoperation(s), and to describe the reoperations performed.
METHODS: A retrospective monocentric study of patients who were operated on following a mesh complication after SC was conducted, at Lille University Hospital, between January 2007 and January 2013. Information relating to medical and surgical history, SC surgical technique, type of complication, and reoperation techniques was gathered.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients required surgery for complications after SC. Nineteen patients were treated for vaginal mesh exposures (VME), four for intravesical mesh (including one with VME), one for ano-rectal dyschezia, one for spondylodiscitis with a VME, one for mesh infection, and one for vaginal fistula communicating with a collection in the ischio-coccygeal muscle. The median time between the initial SC and the first reoperation was 3.9 ± 5.7 years. The median operating time was 40 ± 95 min, and the length of hospital stay was 3.0 ± 3.0 days. Ten patients needed several interventions.
CONCLUSION: This case series provides a description of surgical interventions for complications related to sacral colpopexy. These complications may be serious and occur years after the initial surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25323309     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-014-2514-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  24 in total

1.  [Posterior suspension to the lumbo-sacral disk; abdominal method of replacement of the utero-sacral ligaments].

Authors:  A AMELINE; J HUGUIER
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet (Paris)       Date:  1957 Jan-Mar

2.  Laparoscopic removal of intravesical mesh following pelvic organ prolapse mesh surgery.

Authors:  Christopher Maher; Benjamin Feiner
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy approach for genito-urinary prolapse: experience with 363 cases.

Authors:  Francois Rozet; Eric Mandron; Carlos Arroyo; Henry Andrews; Xavier Cathelineau; Annick Mombet; Nathalie Cathala; Guy Vallancien
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  [Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy: short-term results and complications in 83 patients].

Authors:  M Cosson; E Bogaert; F Narducci; D Querleu; G Crépin
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)       Date:  2000-12

5.  Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  A L Olsen; V J Smith; J O Bergstrom; J C Colling; A L Clark
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 6.  Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Ingrid E Nygaard; Rebecca McCreery; Linda Brubaker; AnnaMarie Connolly; Geoff Cundiff; Anne M Weber; Halina Zyczynski
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 7.  Pyogenic spondylodiscitis associated with sacral colpopexy and rectopexy: report of two cases and evaluation of the literature.

Authors:  Katie Propst; Elena Tunitsky-Bitton; Megan O Schimpf; Beri Ridgeway
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Risk factors for mesh/suture erosion following sacral colpopexy.

Authors:  Geoffrey W Cundiff; Edward Varner; Anthony G Visco; Halina M Zyczynski; Charles W Nager; Peggy A Norton; Joseph Schaffer; Morton B Brown; Linda Brubaker
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Long-term success of abdominal sacral colpopexy using synthetic mesh.

Authors:  Patrick J Culligan; Miles Murphy; Linda Blackwell; Grant Hammons; Carol Graham; Michael H Heit
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 10.  Pyogenic spondylitis.

Authors:  W Y Cheung; Keith D K Luk
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  [Complications after rectal prolapse surgery].

Authors:  T H K Schiedeck
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Systematic reviews of apical prolapse surgery: are we being misled down a dangerous path?

Authors:  Michael Moen; John Gebhart; Karl Tamussino
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Reoperations for mesh-related complications after pelvic organ prolapse repair: 8-year experience at a tertiary referral center.

Authors:  Sophie Warembourg; Majd Labaki; Renaud de Tayrac; Pierre Costa; Brigitte Fatton
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Laparoscopic complete sacrocolpopexy mesh removal for right-sided gluteal pain and recurrent mesh erosion.

Authors:  Aditi Siddharth; Rufus Cartwright; Simon Jackson; Natalia Price
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Mesh exposure following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a narrative review.

Authors:  Stephanie Deblaere; Jan Hauspy; Karen Hansen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 1.932

6.  Mesh complications and failure rates after transvaginal mesh repair compared with abdominal or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and to native tissue repair in treating apical prolapse.

Authors:  Vani Dandolu; Megumi Akiyama; Gayle Allenback; Prathamesh Pathak
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Native tissue repair for central compartment prolapse: a narrative review.

Authors:  Dorit Paz-Levy; David Yohay; Joerg Neymeyer; Ranit Hizkiyahu; Adi Y Weintraub
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Joint position statement on the management of mesh-related complications for the FPMRS specialist.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Sacrocolpopexy: Patient Outcomes Support the Use of Non-Crosslinked Acellular Dermal Matrix as an Alternative to the Synthetic Polypropylene Mesh.

Authors:  Magdalene Karon; Somu Chatterjee
Journal:  J Gynecol Surg       Date:  2019-12-09

10.  Spondylodiscitis after minimally invasive recto- and colpo-sacropexy: Report of a case and systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Philip C Müller; Caroline Berchtold; Christoph Kuemmerli; Claudio Ruzza; Kaspar Z'Graggen; Daniel C Steinemann
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2020 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.