Literature DB >> 10206520

Predictors of cochlear implant performance.

J E van Dijk1, A F van Olphen, M C Langereis, L H Mens, J P Brokx, G F Smoorenburg.   

Abstract

Open set speech understanding with cochlear implants, without speechreading, is nowadays a common finding. However, there is a large variation in speech understanding between cochlear implant users. We tried to find pre-operative parameters which predicted the post-operative results. Thirty-seven adult post-lingually deafened Nucleus cochlear implant users with a mean age of 46 years (range 16 68) and a mean duration of deafness of 15 years (range 1.5-47) were studied. Pre-operatively, we performed pure-tone audiometry, round window and ear canal electrical stimulation, psychological tests and imaging. Additionally, we measured pre-operatively speech understanding in the auditory, the visual and the audiovisual conditions with several tests which were also administered after 6 and 12 months' implant experience. Correlation analysis between the pre-operative variables and the post-operative factors showed that duration of deafness and residual hearing are the most important predictors. The temporal difference limen in pre-operative round window electrical stimulation is a secondary predictor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10206520     DOI: 10.3109/00206099909073010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiology        ISSN: 0020-6091


  28 in total

1.  Modeling spoken word recognition performance by pediatric cochlear implant users using feature identification.

Authors:  S A Frisch; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Audiovisual speech perception in elderly cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Marcia J Hay-McCutcheon; David B Pisoni; Karen Iler Kirk
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Residual hearing in cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Walter Di Nardo; Italo Cantore; Pietro Melillo; Francesca Cianfrone; Alessandro Scorpecci; Gaetano Paludetti
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Auditory-visual speech perception in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Sheetal Desai; Ginger Stickney; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Comparison of speech recognition and localization performance in bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users matched on duration of deafness and age at implantation.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Richard S Tyler; Sarah Oakley; Bruce J Gantz; William Noble
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Predicting Speech Recognition Using the Speech Intelligibility Index and Other Variables for Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Sungmin Lee; Lisa Lucks Mendel; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Speech Rate Normalization and Phonemic Boundary Perception in Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Brittany N Jaekel; Rochelle S Newman; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Experiments on Auditory-Visual Perception of Sentences by Users of Unilateral, Bimodal, and Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Julie Liss; Shuai Wang; Visar Berisha; Cimarron Ludwig; Sarah Cook Natale
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Relationship between age of hearing-loss onset, hearing-loss duration, and speech recognition in individuals with severe-to-profound high-frequency hearing loss.

Authors:  Fabien Seldran; Stéphane Gallego; Christophe Micheyl; Evelyne Veuillet; Eric Truy; Hung Thai-Van
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-02-25

Review 10.  Trends in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.