Literature DB >> 9771630

Speech perception performance in experienced cochlear-implant patients receiving the SPEAK processing strategy in the Nucleus Spectra-22 cochlear implant.

A J Parkinson1, W S Parkinson, R S Tyler, M W Lowder, B J Gantz.   

Abstract

Sixteen experienced cochlear implant patients with a wide range of speech-perception abilities received the SPEAK processing strategy in the Nucleus Spectra-22 cochlear implant. Speech perception was assessed in quiet and in noise with SPEAK and with the patients' previous strategies (for most, Multipeak) at the study onset, as well as after using SPEAK for 6 months. Comparisons were made within and across the two test sessions to elucidate possible learning effects. Patients were also asked to rate the strategies on seven speech recognition and sound quality scales. After 6 months' experience with SPEAK, patients showed significantly improved mean performance on a range of speech recognition measures in quiet and noise. When mean subjective ratings were compared over time there were no significant differences noted between strategies. However, many individuals rated the SPEAK strategy better for two or more of the seven subjective measures. Ratings for "appreciation of music" and "quality of my own voice" in particular were generally higher for SPEAK. Improvements were realized by patients with a wide range of speech perception abilities, including those with little or no open-set speech recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9771630     DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4105.1073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  5 in total

1.  Modeling spoken word recognition performance by pediatric cochlear implant users using feature identification.

Authors:  S A Frisch; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  [A multicentre comparative study of the ESPrit and the Nucleus 22].

Authors:  K Berger; H Bagus; H Michels; J Roth; B Voss; T Klenzner
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  A daily alternating method for comparing different signal-processing strategies in hearing aids and in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Richard S Tyler; Shelley A Witt; Camille C Dunn; Ann E Perreau
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  A Longitudinal Comparison of Environmental Sound Recognition in Adults With Hearing Aids Before and After Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Michael S Harris; Aaron C Moberly; Ben L Hamel; Kara Vasil; Christina L Runge; William J Riggs; Valeriy Shafiro
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.674

5.  Result on speech perception after conversion from Spectra® to Freedom®.

Authors:  Ana Tereza de Matos Magalhães; Maria Valéria Schmidt Goffi-Gomez; Ana Cristina Hoshino; Robinson Koji Tsuji; Ricardo Ferreira Bento; Rubens Brito
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.