Literature DB >> 14733480

Domestic pigeons (Columba livia) discriminate between photographs of individual pigeons.

Tamo Nakamura1, David B Croft, R Frederick Westbrook.   

Abstract

In two experiments, we examined the discrimination of photographs of individual pigeons by pigeons, using go/no-go discrimination procedures. In Experiments 1A and 1B, the pigeons were trained to discriminate 4 photographs of one pigeon from those of a number of pigeons. The subjects learned the discrimination, but their discriminative behavior did not transfer to new photographs taken from novel perspectives. When the pigeons were trained to discriminate between 20 photographs of five pigeons taken from four perspectives as the S+ and 20 photographs of five different pigeons as the S-, the subjects learned the discrimination, and this discriminative behavior partially transferred to new photographs taken from novel perspectives (Experiments 2A-2C). The results suggest that pigeons are able to discriminate among conspecific individuals, using stationary visual cues. This strengthens the assumption in evolutionary theory that animals can discriminate among individuals and encourages further investigation as to how this ability is used in various behaviors of animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14733480     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  21 in total

1.  Natural categorization through multiple feature learning in pigeons.

Authors:  L Huber; N F Troje; M Loidolt; U Aust; D Grass
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2000-11

2.  Effect of lesions in the ectostriatum and Wulst on species and individual discrimination in pigeons.

Authors:  S Watanabe
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1992-08-10       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  What does a pigeon see in a picasso?

Authors:  J Monen; E Brenner; J Reynaerts
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Natural concepts in pigeons.

Authors:  R J Hernstein; D H Loveland; C Cable
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1976-10

5.  Pigeons learn the concept of an "A".

Authors:  M J Morgan; M D Fitch; J G Holman; E G Lea
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Images of conspecifics as categories to be discriminated by pigeons and chickens: Slides, video tapes, stuffed birds and live birds.

Authors:  C M Ryan; S E Lea
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2002-05-31       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Transfer of a discrimination by pigeons (Columba livia) between pictured locations and the represented environments.

Authors:  P D Cole; W K Honig
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Slides of conspecifics as representatives of real animals in laying hens (Gallus domesticus).

Authors:  R H Bradshaw; M S Dawkins
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Categorization of natural stimuli by monkeys (Macaca mulatta): effects of stimulus set size and modification of exemplars.

Authors:  A M Schrier; P M Brady
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1987-04
View more
  10 in total

1.  Limits of dynamic object perception in pigeons: dynamic stimulus presentation does not enhance perception and discrimination of complex shape.

Authors:  Michaela Loidolt; Ulrike Aust; Michael Steurer; Nikolaus F Troje; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 2.  The neuroscience of perceptual categorization in pigeons: A mechanistic hypothesis.

Authors:  Onur Güntürkün; Charlotte Koenen; Fabrizio Iovine; Alexis Garland; Roland Pusch
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Domestic pigeons (Columba livia) discriminate between photographs of male and female pigeons.

Authors:  Tamo Nakamura; Masato Ito; David B Croft; R Frederick Westbrook
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  A comparative view of face perception.

Authors:  David A Leopold; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.231

5.  Discrimination of human faces by archerfish (Toxotes chatareus).

Authors:  Cait Newport; Guy Wallis; Yarema Reshitnyk; Ulrike E Siebeck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Sheep recognize familiar and unfamiliar human faces from two-dimensional images.

Authors:  Franziska Knolle; Rita P Goncalves; A Jennifer Morton
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 7.  Thinking chickens: a review of cognition, emotion, and behavior in the domestic chicken.

Authors:  Lori Marino
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Pigeons integrate past knowledge across sensory modalities.

Authors:  Claudia Stephan; Thomas Bugnyar
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  A nocturnal rail with a simple territorial call eavesdrops on interactions between rivals.

Authors:  Lucyna Ewa Wojas; Paweł Wojciech Podkowa; Tomasz Stanisław Osiejuk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparing the face inversion effect in crows and humans.

Authors:  Katharina F Brecht; Lysann Wagener; Ljerka Ostojić; Nicola S Clayton; Andreas Nieder
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 1.836

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.