Literature DB >> 16885138

The impact of letter detection on eye movement patterns during reading: Reconsidering lexical analysis in connected text as a function of task.

Seth N Greenberg1, Albrecht W Inhoff, Ulrich W Weger.   

Abstract

A comparison was made between reading tasks performed with and without the additional requirement of detecting target letters. At issue was whether eye movement measures are affected by the additional requirement of detection. Global comparisons showed robust effects of task type with longer fixations and fewer word skippings when letter detection was required. Detailed analyses of target words, however, further showed that reading with and without letter detection yielded virtually identical effects of word class and text predictability for word-skipping rate and similar effects for different word viewing duration measures. The overall oculomotor pattern suggested that detection does not substantially shift normal reading movements in response to lexical cues and thereby indicated that detection tasks are informative about word and specifically word class processing in normal reading.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16885138      PMCID: PMC2694497          DOI: 10.1080/17470210600654776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  15 in total

1.  Lexical processing and text integration of function and content words: evidence from priming and eye fixations.

Authors:  A R Schmauder; R K Morris; D V Poynor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-10

2.  Letter detection in very familiar texts.

Authors:  S N Greenberg; J Tai
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-12

3.  Direct assessments of the processing time hypothesis for the missing-letter effect.

Authors:  Jean Saint-Aubin; Raymond M Klein; Annie Roy-Charland
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The GO model: a reconsideration of the role of structural units in guiding and organizing text on line.

Authors:  Seth N Greenberg; Alice F Healy; Asher Koriat; Hamutal Kreiner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

5.  Trade-offs in detecting letters and comprehending text.

Authors:  William L Oliver; Alice F Healy; Ernest F Mross
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2005-09

6.  Memory for word location during reading: eye movements to previously read words are spatially selective but not precise.

Authors:  Albrecht W Inhoff; Ulrich W Weger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-04

7.  Detection errors on the word the: evidence for reading units larger than letters.

Authors:  A F Healy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Eye movement control in reading and visual search: Effects of word frequency.

Authors:  K Rayner; G E Raney
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-06

9.  Mindless reading: eye-movement characteristics are similar in scanning letter strings and reading texts.

Authors:  F Vitu; J K O'Regan; A W Inhoff; R Topolski
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-04

10.  Attention demands during reading and the occurrence of brief (express) fixations.

Authors:  A W Inhoff; R Topolski; F Vitu; J K O'Regan
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-12
View more
  3 in total

1.  The role of global top-down factors in local eye-movement control in reading.

Authors:  Ralph Radach; Lynn Huestegge; Ronan Reilly
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-10-21

2.  The utility of modeling word identification from visual input within models of eye movements in reading.

Authors:  Klinton Bicknell; Roger Levy
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2012-05-23

3.  The influence of multiple readings on the missing-letter effect revisited.

Authors:  Jean Saint-Aubin; Anie Roy-Charland; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.