Literature DB >> 33043065

The representation of plural inflectional affixes in English: Evidence from priming in an auditory lexical decision task.

Amy Goodwin Davies1, David Embick1.   

Abstract

The representation of inflection is controversial: theories of morphological processing range from those that treat all inflectional morphemes as independently represented in memory to those that deny independent representation for any inflectional morphemes. Whereas identity priming for stems and derivational affixes is regularly reported, priming of inflectional affixes is understudied and has produced no clear consensus. This paper reports results from a continuous auditory lexical decision task investigating priming of plural inflectional affixes in English, in plural prime-target pairs such as crimes→trees. Our results show statistically significant priming facilitation for plural primes relative to phonological (cleanse→trees) and singular (crime→trees) controls. This finding indicates that inflectional affixes, like lexical stems, exhibit identity priming effects. We discuss implications for morphological theory and point to questions for further work addressing which representation(s) produce the priming effect.

Entities:  

Keywords:  identity priming; inflection; lexical decision; morphology

Year:  2019        PMID: 33043065      PMCID: PMC7545954          DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2019.1684528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 2327-3798            Impact factor:   2.331


  21 in total

1.  Discrepancies between orthographic and unrelated baselines in masked priming undermine a decompositional account of morphological facilitation.

Authors:  Matthew John Pastizzo; Laurie Beth Feldman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Bias effects in facilitatory phonological priming.

Authors:  Dennis Norris; James M McQueen; Anne Cutler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-04

3.  An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components.

Authors:  F E SATTERTHWAITE
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1946-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Does verb bias modulate syntactic priming?

Authors:  Sarah Bernolet; Robert J Hartsuiker
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-01-19

5.  Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English.

Authors:  Marc Brysbaert; Boris New
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

6.  An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning.

Authors:  R Harald Baayen; Petar Milin; Dusica Filipović Đurđević; Peter Hendrix; Marco Marelli
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Auditory morphological processing: Evidence from phonological priming.

Authors:  Hezekiah Akiva Bacovcin; Amy Goodwin Davies; Robert J Wilder; David Embick
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-04-07

8.  Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: syntactic priming is affected by the prime's prediction error given both prior and recent experience.

Authors:  T Florian Jaeger; Neal E Snider
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-01-23

9.  Take a stand on understanding: electrophysiological evidence for stem access in German complex verbs.

Authors:  Eva Smolka; Matthias Gondan; Frank Rösler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 10.  The Salience of Complex Words and Their Parts: Which Comes First?

Authors:  Hélène Giraudo; Serena Dal Maso
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-21
View more
  1 in total

1.  Opacity, Transparency, and Morphological Priming: A Study of Prefixed Verbs in Dutch.

Authors:  Ava Creemers; Amy Goodwin Davies; Robert J Wilder; Meredith Tamminga; David Embick
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 3.059

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.