Literature DB >> 11112726

Using formal evaluation sessions for case-based faculty development during clinical clerkships.

P A Hemmer1, L Pangaro.   

Abstract

Developing housestaff and faculty in their roles as medical educators is a dynamic process. The rigorous clinical evaluation method used during the third-year internal medicine clerkship at the Uniformed Services University uniquely incorporates faculty development into the process of evaluation and generating feedback for students. Formal evaluation sessions are held monthly at all clerkship sites throughout the 12-week clerkship and are moderated by either the internal medicine clerkship director or the on-site clerkship directors. Although designed to provide an opportunity for faculty to evaluate student performance and prepare formative feedback, the sessions also function as formal, planned, and longitudinal forums of "real-time," "case-based" faculty development that address professional, instructional, and leadership development. The evaluation sessions are used as a means to model and teach the key concepts of the Stanford Faculty Development Program. Providing a unifying form of evaluation across multiple teaching sites and settings makes formal evaluation sessions a powerful, state-of-the-art tool for faculty development.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11112726     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200012000-00021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  9 in total

1.  Reliable, valid, and educational in-training medical student evaluation overlooked.

Authors:  P A Hemmer; T Jamieson; L N Pangaro
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  [Dilemmas and alternatives in the evaluation of family doctor training].

Authors:  J R Loayssa Lara
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 1.137

3.  The association of student examination performance with faculty and resident ratings using a modified RIME process.

Authors:  Charles H Griffith; John F Wilson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Group assessments of resident physicians improve reliability and decrease halo error.

Authors:  Matthew R Thomas; Thomas J Beckman; Karen F Mauck; Stephen S Cha; Kris G Thomas
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Regular Formal Evaluation Sessions are Effective as Frame-of-Reference Training for Faculty Evaluators of Clerkship Medical Students.

Authors:  Paul A Hemmer; Gregory A Dadekian; Christopher Terndrup; Louis N Pangaro; Allison B Weisbrod; Mark D Corriere; Rechell Rodriguez; Patricia Short; William F Kelly
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Consequence in Competency-Based Education: Individualize, but Do Not Compromise.

Authors:  Katherine Gielissen; Lia Logio; Kelli Qua; Paul Hemmer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 6.473

7.  Faculty verbal evaluations reveal strategies used to promote medical student performance.

Authors:  Karen E Hauer; Lindsay Mazotti; Bridget O'Brien; Paul A Hemmer; Lowell Tong
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2011-05-16

8.  We need to talk: clinical competency committees in the key of c(onversation).

Authors:  Paul A Hemmer; William F Kelly
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2017-06

9.  Faculty development for the evaluation system: a dual agenda.

Authors:  Kellee L Oller; Cuc T Mai; Robert J Ledford; Kevin E O'Brien
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2017-03-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.