Literature DB >> 18612736

The association of student examination performance with faculty and resident ratings using a modified RIME process.

Charles H Griffith1, John F Wilson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: RIME is a descriptive framework in which students and their teachers can gauge progress throughout a clerkship from R (reporter) to I (interpreter) to M (manager) to E (educator). RIME, as described in the literature, is complemented by residents and attending physicians meeting with a clerkship director to discuss individual student progress, with group discussion resulting in assignment of a RIME stage.
OBJECTIVE: 1) to determine whether a student's RIME rating is associated with end-of-clerkship examination performance; and 2) to determine whose independent RIME rating is most predictive of a student's examination performance: attendings, residents, or interns.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Third year medical students from academic years 2004-2005 and early 2005-2006 at 1 medical school.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Each attending, resident, and intern independently assessed the student's final RIME stage attained. For the purpose of analysis, R stage=1, I=2, M=3, and E=4. Regression analyses were performed with examination scores as dependent variables (National Board of Medical Examiners [NBME] medicine subject examination and a clinical performance examination [CPE]), with independent variables of mean attending RIME score, mean resident score, and mean intern score. For the 122 students, significant predictors of NBME subject exam score were resident RIME rating (p = .008) and intern RIME rating (p = .02). Significant predictor of CPE performance was resident RIME rating (p = .01).
CONCLUSION: House staff RIME ratings of students are associated with student performance on written and clinical skills examinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18612736      PMCID: PMC2517939          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0611-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  15 in total

1.  Assessing how well three evaluation methods detect deficiencies in medical students' professionalism in two settings of an internal medicine clerkship.

Authors:  P A Hemmer; R Hawkins; J L Jackson; L N Pangaro
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Using formal evaluation sessions for case-based faculty development during clinical clerkships.

Authors:  P A Hemmer; L Pangaro
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  The feasibility and acceptability of implementing formal evaluation sessions and using descriptive vocabulary to assess student performance on a clinical clerkship.

Authors:  Michael J Battistone; Caroline Milne; Merle A Sande; Louis N Pangaro; Paul A Hemmer; T Samuel Shomaker
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.414

4.  Global descriptive evaluations are more responsive than global numeric ratings in detecting students' progress during the inpatient portion of an internal medicine clerkship.

Authors:  M J Battistone; B Pendleton; C Milne; M L Battistone; M A Sande; P A Hemmer; T S Shomaker
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  The R-I-M-E method for evaluation of medical students on an obstetrics and gynecology clerkship.

Authors:  Tony Ogburn; Eve Espey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Does group discussion of student clerkship performance at an education committee affect an individual committee member's decisions?

Authors:  Margaret Mackrell Gaglione; Lisa Moores; Louis Pangaro; Paul A Hemmer
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Evaluation, grading, and use of the RIME vocabulary on internal medicine clerkships: results of a national survey and comparison to other clinical clerkships.

Authors:  Paul A Hemmer; Klara K Papp; Alex J Mechaber; Steven J Durning
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.414

8.  Do students who work with better housestaff in their medicine clerkships learn more?

Authors:  C H Griffith; J F Wilson; S A Haist; M Ramsbottom-Lucier
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Investing in descriptive evaluation: a vision for the future of assessment.

Authors:  L N Pangaro
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.650

10.  The effectiveness of formal evaluation sessions during clinical clerkships in better identifying students with marginal funds of knowledge.

Authors:  P A Hemmer; L Pangaro
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.893

View more
  3 in total

1.  Navigating the JGIM Special Issue on Medical Education.

Authors:  Judith L Bowen; David A Cook; Martha Gerrity; Adina L Kalet; Jennifer R Kogan; Anderson Spickard; Diane B Wayne
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Regular Formal Evaluation Sessions are Effective as Frame-of-Reference Training for Faculty Evaluators of Clerkship Medical Students.

Authors:  Paul A Hemmer; Gregory A Dadekian; Christopher Terndrup; Louis N Pangaro; Allison B Weisbrod; Mark D Corriere; Rechell Rodriguez; Patricia Short; William F Kelly
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Impact of a structured review session on medical student psychiatry subject examination performance.

Authors:  Shan H Siddiqi; Kevin J Black; Fay Y Womer
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2015-09-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.