Literature DB >> 11112201

Early failure of modern cemented stems.

R L Barrack1.   

Abstract

In the late 1970s, improved cement technique was introduced in an attempt to address the problem of early cemented stem loosening. Subsequently, numerous centers reported stem survival rates of >95% beyond 10 years. Long-term cemented stem fixation was believed widely to be consistently obtainable in most patients. Despite the widespread clinical success of these early cemented stems, numerous changes were introduced in stem design and cement technique. In more recent years, a surprising number of series of early failures of cemented stems have been reported. Some designs consistently have had a high early failure rate. Others have failed infrequently, but the failures have occurred early and with extensive osteolysis. Numerous causes have been proposed, including poor cement technique, undersized broaches, increased stem offset, decreased stem length, rough surface finish, and circular stem cross-section. Failures often are multifactorial and defy a simple explanation based on a single parameter. Results of cemented stems are more variable than previously appreciated. There are nuances of cemented stem design, cement technique, and patient selection that can lead to early failure and that are not understood completely at present. Given the availability of many cemented designs with proven records of clinical success, new design features should be introduced prudently with extensive premarket testing, limited clinical release, and careful postmarket surveillance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11112201     DOI: 10.1054/arth.2000.16498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  15 in total

1.  [The cemented MS-30 stem. A multi-surgeon series of 333 consecutive cases].

Authors:  M Clauss; T Reitzel; M Pritsch; U J Schlegel; R G Bitsch; V Ewerbeck; H Mau; S J Breusch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Clinical and biological assessment of cemented titanium femoral stems: an 11-year experience.

Authors:  Patrick Boyer; Jean-Yves Lazennec; Joel Poupon; Marc-Antoine Rousseau; Philippe Ravaud; Yves Catonné
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Using 'subcement' to simulate the long-term fatigue response of cemented femoral stems in a cadaver model: could a novel preclinical screening test have caught the Exeter matt problem?

Authors:  A Race; M A Miller; K A Mann
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.617

4.  [Painful hip arthroplasty: a diagnostic algorithm].

Authors:  M Hoberg; B M Holzapfel; M Rudert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  CORR Insights®: systemic review of literature of cemented femoral components: what is the durability at minimum 20 years followup?

Authors:  Bernd Fink
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The effect of a collar and surface finish on cemented femoral stems: a prospective randomised trial of four stem designs.

Authors:  Jonathan Hutt; Alexandra Hazlerigg; Ansari Aneel; Geoffrey Epie; Husam Dabis; Roy Twyman; Andrew Cobb
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Fracture of Fully-coated Femoral Stem after Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty for Nonunion of Intertrochanteric Fracture: A Case Report.

Authors:  Young Soo Chun; Hyung Suk Juh; Yoon Je Cho; Kee Hyung Rhyu
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2015-09-30

8.  Evaluation of the in vitro biocompatibility of PMMA/high-load HA/carbon nanostructures bone cement formulations.

Authors:  Gil Gonçalves; María-Teresa Portolés; Cecilia Ramírez-Santillán; María Vallet-Regí; Ana Paula Serro; José Grácio; Paula A A P Marques
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  [Survey of incidents associated with hip and knee replacement devices. Analysis of the surveillance and registration system for medical products for the years 2000-2002].

Authors:  B C Heinz; D von Mallek
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  A modified PMMA cement (Sub-cement) for accelerated fatigue testing of cemented implant constructs using cadaveric bone.

Authors:  Amos Race; Mark A Miller; Kenneth A Mann
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.