Literature DB >> 11108592

Factors affecting the genetic load in Drosophila: synergistic epistasis and correlations among fitness components.

M C Whitlock1, D Bourguet.   

Abstract

Two factors that can affect genetic load, synergistic epistasis and sexual selection, were investigated in Drosophila melanogaster. A set of five chromosomal regions containing visible recessive mutations were put together in all combinations to create a full set of 32 homozygous lines fixed for different numbers of known mutations. Two measures of fitness were made for each line: productivity (a combined measure of fecundity and egg-to-adult survivorship) and competitive male mating success. Productivity, but not male mating success, showed a pattern of strong average synergistic epistasis, such that the log fitness declined nonlinearly with increasing numbers of mutations. Synergistic epistasis is known to reduce the mutation load. Both fitness components show some positive and some negative interactions between specific sets of mutations. Furthermore, alleles with deleterious effects on productivity tend to also diminish male mating success. Given that male mating success can affect relative fitness without changing the mean productivity of a population, these additional effects would lead to lower frequencies and lower fixation rates of deleterious alleles without higher costs to the mean fitness of the population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11108592     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00709.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  45 in total

1.  Epistasis and the mutation load: a measurement-theoretical approach.

Authors:  T F Hansen; G P Wagner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Are males the more 'sensitive' sex?

Authors:  A F Agrawal
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Reduction in the cumulative effect of stress-induced inbreeding depression due to intragenerational purging in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  L S Enders; L Nunney
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Self-fertilization and the evolution of recombination.

Authors:  Denis Roze; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-03-21       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Effects of random mutations in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transcriptional promoter on viral fitness in different host cell environments.

Authors:  Tim van Opijnen; Maarten C Boerlijst; Ben Berkhout
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 6.  Mechanisms of genetic robustness in RNA viruses.

Authors:  Santiago F Elena; Purificación Carrasco; José-Antonio Daròs; Rafael Sanjuán
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 8.807

7.  Epistasis correlates to genomic complexity.

Authors:  Rafael Sanjuán; Santiago F Elena
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Joint evolution of dispersal and inbreeding load.

Authors:  Frédéric Guillaume; Nicolas Perrin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Evolution can favor antagonistic epistasis.

Authors:  Michael M Desai; Daniel Weissman; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The effect of parasites on sex differences in selection.

Authors:  N P Sharp; C M Vincent
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.821

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.