Literature DB >> 26604190

Reduction in the cumulative effect of stress-induced inbreeding depression due to intragenerational purging in Drosophila melanogaster.

L S Enders1,2, L Nunney1.   

Abstract

Environmental stress generally exacerbates the harmful effects of inbreeding and it has been proposed that this could be exploited in purging deleterious alleles from threatened inbred populations. However, understanding what factors contribute to variability in the strength of inbreeding depression (ID) observed across adverse environmental conditions remains a challenge. Here, we examined how the nature and timing of stress affects ID and the potential for purging using inbred and outbred Drosophila melanogaster larvae exposed to biotic (larval competition, bacteria infection) and abiotic (ethanol, heat) stressors compared with unstressed controls. ID was measured during (larval survival) and after (male mating success) stress exposure. The level of stress imposed by each stressor was approximately equal, averaging a 42% reduction in outbred larval survival relative to controls. All stressors induced on average the same ID, causing a threefold increase in lethal equivalents for larval survival relative to controls. However, stress-induced ID in larval success was followed by a 30% reduction in ID in mating success of surviving males. We propose that this fitness recovery is due to 'intragenerational purging' whereby fitness correlations facilitate stress-induced purging that increases the average fitness of survivors in later life history stages. For biotic stressors, post-stress reductions in ID are consistent with intragenerational purging, whereas for abiotic stressors, there appeared to be an interaction between purging and stress-induced physiological damage. For all stressors, there was no net effect of stress on lifetime ID compared with unstressed controls, undermining the prediction that stress enhances the effectiveness of population-level purging across generations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26604190      PMCID: PMC4806569          DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2015.103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  40 in total

1.  Genome-wide analysis on inbreeding effects on gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Torsten Nygaard Kristensen; Peter Sørensen; Mogens Kruhøffer; Kamilla Sofie Pedersen; Volker Loeschcke
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Ancestral inbreeding reduces the magnitude of inbreeding depression in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  William R Swindell; Juan L Bouzat
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Effects of stress and phenotypic variation on inbreeding depression in Brassica rapa.

Authors:  Donald M Waller; Jefferey Dole; Andrew J Bersch
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 4.  Inbreeding-stress interactions: evolutionary and conservation consequences.

Authors:  David H Reed; Charles W Fox; Laramy S Enders; Torsten N Kristensen
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Purging deleterious mutations in conservation programmes: combining optimal contributions with inbred matings.

Authors:  M Á R de Cara; B Villanueva; M Á Toro; J Fernández
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Purging inbreeding depression and the probability of extinction: full-sib mating.

Authors:  P W Hedrick
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Environmental conditions during early life determine the consequences of inbreeding in Agrostemma githago (Caryophyllaceae).

Authors:  S H Goodrich; C M Beans; D A Roach
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 2.411

8.  Seasonal stress drives predictable changes in inbreeding depression in field-tested captive populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Laramy S Enders; Leonard Nunney
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Genetic analysis of insulin signaling in Drosophila.

Authors:  Robert S Garofalo
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 12.015

10.  Genetic erosion impedes adaptive responses to stressful environments.

Authors:  R Bijlsma; Volker Loeschcke
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 5.183

View more
  5 in total

1.  Genetic architecture and lifetime dynamics of inbreeding depression in a wild mammal.

Authors:  M A Stoffel; S E Johnston; J G Pilkington; J M Pemberton
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  Detecting purging of inbreeding depression by a slow rate of inbreeding for various traits: the impact of environmental and experimental conditions.

Authors:  Jørgen Bundgaard; Volker Loeschcke; Mads Fristrup Schou; Kuke R Bijlsma
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 3.832

3.  Inbreeding depression by environment interactions in a free-living mammal population.

Authors:  J M Pemberton; P E Ellis; J G Pilkington; C Bérénos
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Environment dependence of the expression of mutational load and species' range limits.

Authors:  Antoine Perrier; Darío Sánchez-Castro; Yvonne Willi
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 2.516

Review 5.  Sex-specific inbreeding depression: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Regina Vega-Trejo; Raïssa A de Boer; John L Fitzpatrick; Alexander Kotrschal
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 11.274

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.