Literature DB >> 11103154

Laparoscopic appendicectomy: safe and useful for training.

S E Duff1, A R Dixon.   

Abstract

Debate exists about the benefits of laparoscopic appendicectomy when compared to a conventional open procedure. The majority of appendices are removed by the open route in the UK. We report a series of 132 cases of suspected appendicitis managed laparoscopically: 112 (85%) of the patients had acute appendicitis, the remaining 20 (15%) had non-appendiceal pathology. The median operative time was 30 min and there were no conversions to an open operative procedure. The median postoperative stay was two days. Complications were seen in two patients. The published evidence comparing laparoscopic and open appendicectomy is contradictory. Our series shows that laparoscopic appendicectomy is a safe procedure with low morbidity; it is also an excellent training tool in laparoscopic technique and, with sufficient experience, takes no longer than an open procedure. Negative appendicocecotomies are most common in women of fertile age and can be associated with significant morbidity; therefore, laparoscopy should be used to make the diagnosis and, if appendicitis is the cause, the appendix could safely be removed laparoscopically. However, the choice between open and laparoscopic procedure is a subjective decision for the patient and their surgeon. Laparoscopic appendicectomy cannot be regarded as the gold standard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11103154      PMCID: PMC2503470     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  17 in total

1.  A case for the removal of the 'normal' appendix at laparoscopy for suspected acute appendicitis.

Authors:  J A Grabham; C Sutton; M L Nicholson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: a prospective evaluation.

Authors:  O J McAnena; O Austin; P R O'Connell; W P Hederman; T F Gorey; J Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Laparoscopic appendectomy in 625 cases: from innovation to routine.

Authors:  A Pier; F Götz; C Bacher
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-03

4.  Laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  A Pier; F Götz; C Bacher; R Ibald
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  J J Tate; J W Dawson; S C Chung; W Y Lau; A K Li
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-09-11       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy.

Authors:  A Hellberg; C Rudberg; E Kullman; L Enochsson; G Fenyö; H Graffner; B Hallerbäck; B Johansson; B Anderberg; J Wenner; I Ringqvist; S Sörensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Appendicitis near its centenary.

Authors:  J Berry; R A Malt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  R C Frazee; J W Roberts; R E Symmonds; S K Snyder; J C Hendricks; R W Smith; M D Custer; J B Harrison
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.

Authors:  S E Attwood; A D Hill; P G Murphy; J Thornton; R B Stephens
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy.

Authors:  V L Vallina; J M Velasco; C S McCulloch
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  4 in total

1.  Training in laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  Karl J Sweeney; Mary Dillon; Sean M Johnston; Frank B Keane; Kevin C Conlon
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Laparoscopic surgery for common surgical emergencies: a population-based study.

Authors:  C M Lam; A W Yuen; B Chik; A C Wai; S T Fan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-04       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Province-wide population survey of acute appendicitis in Canada. New twists to an old disease.

Authors:  J-P Gagné; M Billard; R Gagnon; M Laurion; A Jacques
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Outcome comparison between laparoscopic and open appendectomy: evidence from a nationwide population-based study.

Authors:  Chien-Che Wang; Chao-Chiang Tu; Pi-Chieh Wang; Herng-Ching Lin; Po-Li Wei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.