Literature DB >> 1393483

Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: a prospective evaluation.

O J McAnena1, O Austin, P R O'Connell, W P Hederman, T F Gorey, J Fitzpatrick.   

Abstract

A prospective evaluation of laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis over a 6-month period is reported. Sixty-five patients with signs and symptoms of appendicitis necessitating surgery were assigned to open (n = 36) or laparoscopic (n = 29) appendicectomy. Thirty-seven patients were female (22 open) and 28 were male (14 open). The median age was 24 (range 14-64) years for open appendicectomy and 18 (range 14-60) years for the laparoscopic procedure. The mean postoperative stay for open operation was 4.8 (range 1-21) days and for the laparoscopic route 2.2 (range 1-11) days (P < 0.05). Inflammation was confirmed histologically in 72 per cent of the open cases and in 74 per cent of the laparoscopic cases (P not significant). The wound infection rate was 11 per cent (n = 4) for open and 4 per cent (n = 1) for laparoscopic appendicectomy (P < 0.05). The median anaesthesia time was 52 (range 15-90) min for open appendicectomy and 48 (range 20-120) min for laparoscopic surgery (P not significant). After open appendicectomy patients had a median of 5 (range 2-12) intramuscular injections of analgesia compared with a median of 1 (range 0-5) in the laparoscopic group (P < 0.05). Two laparoscopic operations were converted to an open procedure. The results suggest that emergency laparoscopic appendicectomy should be explored further as an alternative to open surgery for acute appendicitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1393483     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800790837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  31 in total

1.  Mini-laparoscopic appendectomy using a needle loop retractor offers optimal cosmetic results.

Authors:  N Sato; M Kojika; Y Yaegashi; Y Suzuki; M Kitamura; S Endo; K Saito
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic surgery at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital.

Authors:  C S Grant; N Al-Kindy; N Machado; A S Daar
Journal:  J Sci Res Med Sci       Date:  2000-01

Review 3.  Day surgery and gastroenterology.

Authors:  D Fenton-Lee; E Riach; T G Cooke
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Pelvic abscess following laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  F A Frizelle; G B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic appendicectomy: safe and useful for training.

Authors:  S E Duff; A R Dixon
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  S Olmi; S Magnone; A Bertolini; E Croce
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  [Laparoscopic appendectomy. A review of the literature].

Authors:  M Gawenda; S Said
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1994

8.  Laparoscopic versus conventional surgery for suspected appendicitis in women.

Authors:  G Zaninotto; M Rossi; M Anselmino; M Costantini; S Pianalto; N Baldan; D Pizzato; E Ancona
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  [Quality management during postoperative pain therapy].

Authors:  B Geissler; E Neugebauer; R Angster; J Witte Dagger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Prospective nonrandomized study of conventional versus laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  O Reiertsen; E Trondsen; A Bakka; O K Andersen; S Larsen; A R Rosseland
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.