BACKGROUND: This study, sponsored and conducted by Le Collège des Médecins du Québec, audited the management of acute appendicitis in the Province of Québec (Population 7.6 million), Canada, over a period of 1 year (April 2002-March 2003). METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to the Health Records Department of all hospitals surgically treating appendicitis in the province. Data from 85 (100%) hospitals were received and reviewed. RESULTS: During the study period, 7,599 appendectomies were performed, and 5,707 (75%) were selected for study (55% men). The rate of normal and perforated appendix was 5.4% and 15.9% respectively. Median hospital stay for simple and perforated appendicitis was 2.6 and 5.8 days, respectively. At least one imaging procedure was done in 86% of cases (23% computed tomography [CT], 55% ultrasound). Antibiotics were not given in 7% of cases and in 8% of patients with a perforation. Seventeen percent of patients did not receive preoperative or intraoperative doses, and postoperatively, 69% of patients received unnecessary doses. Laparoscopy was used in 35% of cases and was associated with a reduction in postoperative stay for simple (2.6 versus 2.9 days, p < 0.001) and perforated appendicitis (4.6 versus 5.9 days, p = 0.004). A low rate of laparoscopy (<25%) was found in 53% of teaching (University and Affiliated) and 45% of nonteaching institutions. Conversion to open surgery was necessary in 9.7% of simple appendicitis and 29.3% of perforated ones (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although results of this survey are comparable to those of similar published series, a few concerns emerge. Many have to do with patient noncompliance with recommended antibiotic usage for acute appendicitis. Further, although laparoscopy seems to be slowly making its way into the surgical armamentarium, the low rate of laparoscopic appendectomies in teaching hospitals raises the issue of appropriate resident training.
BACKGROUND: This study, sponsored and conducted by Le Collège des Médecins du Québec, audited the management of acute appendicitis in the Province of Québec (Population 7.6 million), Canada, over a period of 1 year (April 2002-March 2003). METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to the Health Records Department of all hospitals surgically treating appendicitis in the province. Data from 85 (100%) hospitals were received and reviewed. RESULTS: During the study period, 7,599 appendectomies were performed, and 5,707 (75%) were selected for study (55% men). The rate of normal and perforated appendix was 5.4% and 15.9% respectively. Median hospital stay for simple and perforated appendicitis was 2.6 and 5.8 days, respectively. At least one imaging procedure was done in 86% of cases (23% computed tomography [CT], 55% ultrasound). Antibiotics were not given in 7% of cases and in 8% of patients with a perforation. Seventeen percent of patients did not receive preoperative or intraoperative doses, and postoperatively, 69% of patients received unnecessary doses. Laparoscopy was used in 35% of cases and was associated with a reduction in postoperative stay for simple (2.6 versus 2.9 days, p < 0.001) and perforated appendicitis (4.6 versus 5.9 days, p = 0.004). A low rate of laparoscopy (<25%) was found in 53% of teaching (University and Affiliated) and 45% of nonteaching institutions. Conversion to open surgery was necessary in 9.7% of simple appendicitis and 29.3% of perforated ones (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although results of this survey are comparable to those of similar published series, a few concerns emerge. Many have to do with patient noncompliance with recommended antibiotic usage for acute appendicitis. Further, although laparoscopy seems to be slowly making its way into the surgical armamentarium, the low rate of laparoscopic appendectomies in teaching hospitals raises the issue of appropriate resident training.
Authors: H Körner; K Söndenaa; J A Söreide; E Andersen; A Nysted; T H Lende; K H Kjellevold Journal: World J Surg Date: 1997 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Ulrich Guller; Sheleika Hervey; Harriett Purves; Lawrence H Muhlbaier; Eric D Peterson; Steve Eubanks; Ricardo Pietrobon Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Stephanie Coward; Hashim Kareemi; Fiona Clement; Scott Zimmer; Elijah Dixon; Chad G Ball; Steven J Heitman; Mark Swain; Subrata Ghosh; Gilaad G Kaplan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-11-07 Impact factor: 3.240