Literature DB >> 1387739

A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.

S E Attwood1, A D Hill, P G Murphy, J Thornton, R B Stephens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic appendectomy is feasible, but whether it confers any advantage to patients with acute appendicitis is not known. We performed a randomized controlled trial to compare results of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in patients with signs and symptoms suggesting acute appendicitis who were seen by one surgical team.
METHODS: Sixty-two consecutive patients were randomized, 30 to laparoscopy and 32 to a classical open appendectomy. Postoperative recovery, complications, and return to normal activities were compared in the two groups.
RESULTS: The laparoscopy group were discharged earlier (2.5 vs 3.8 days, p less than 0.01). Postoperative complications were more frequent after open appendectomy. Follow-up showed less pain, shorter bed stay at home, and faster return to work and sport after laparoscopic appendectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: This prospective randomized study shows that laparoscopic appendectomy is superior to open appendectomy in terms of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and return to normal activities and is recommended as the approach of choice in the management of acute appendicitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1387739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  77 in total

1.  Ultrasonography in diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Diagnostic laparoscopy is often more useful than ultrasonography.

Authors:  S Attwood
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-10

2.  Safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of common laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Manish M Tiwari; Jason F Reynoso; Robin High; Albert W Tsang; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  SAGES Appropriateness Conference: a summary.

Authors:  R E Glasgow; A Fingerhut; J Hunter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-09-29       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic appendectomy is a favorable alternative for complicated appendicitis in children.

Authors:  Mohammad Saquib Mallick; Aayed Al-Qahtani; Abdulrahman Al-Bassam
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  Securing the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: evidence for routine stapling?

Authors:  G Kazemier; K H in't Hof; S Saad; H J Bonjer; S Sauerland
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.

Authors:  Heng-Fu Lin; Jiann-Ming Wu; Li-Ming Tseng; Kuo-Hsin Chen; Shih-Horng Huang; I-Rue Lai
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy: a critical review.

Authors:  M Kapischke; A Caliebe; J Tepel; T Schulz; J Hedderich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Training in laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  Karl J Sweeney; Mary Dillon; Sean M Johnston; Frank B Keane; Kevin C Conlon
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database.

Authors:  Ulrich Guller; Sheleika Hervey; Harriett Purves; Lawrence H Muhlbaier; Eric D Peterson; Steve Eubanks; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Laparoscopic versus conventional surgery for suspected appendicitis in women.

Authors:  G Zaninotto; M Rossi; M Anselmino; M Costantini; S Pianalto; N Baldan; D Pizzato; E Ancona
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.