Literature DB >> 19387709

Clinical evaluation of a lumbar interspinous dynamic stabilization device (the Wallis system) with a 13-year mean follow-up.

Jacques Sénégas1, Jean-Marc Vital, Vincent Pointillart, Paolo Mangione.   

Abstract

The authors determined current health status of patients who had been included in a long-term survivorship analysis of a lumbar dynamic stabilizer. Among 133 living patients, 107 (average age at surgery, 44.2 +/- 9.9 years) completed health questionnaires. All patients had initially been scheduled for decompression and fusion for canal stenosis, herniated disc, or both. In 20 patients, the implant was removed, and fusion was performed. The other 87 still had the dynamic stabilizer. Satisfaction, Oswestry disability index, visual analog scales for back and leg pain, short-form (SF-36) quality-of-life physical composite score, physical function, and social function were significantly better (p < or = 0.05) in the patients who still had the dynamic stabilization device. SF-36 scores of the fused subgroup were no worse than those reported elsewhere in patients who had primary pedicle-screw enhanced lumbar fusion. This anatomy-sparing device provided a good 13-year clinical outcome and obviated arthrodesis in 80% of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19387709     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-009-0199-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  27 in total

1.  [Long-term influence of associated arthrodesis on adjacent segments in the treatment of lumbar stenosis: a series of 127 cases with 9-year follow-up].

Authors:  P Guigui; P Wodecki; P Bizot; P Lambert; G Chaumeil; A Deburge
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  2000-10

2.  Effect of an internal fixator and a bone graft on intersegmental spinal motion and intradiscal pressure in the adjacent regions.

Authors:  A Rohlmann; S Neller; G Bergmann; F Graichen; L Claes; H J Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Radiologic assessment of all unfused lumbar segments 7.5 years after instrumented posterior spinal fusion.

Authors:  Ferran Pellisé; Alejandro Hernández; Xavier Vidal; Joan Minguell; Cristobal Martínez; Carlos Villanueva
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Classification of posterior dynamic stabilization devices.

Authors:  Paul Khoueir; K Anthony Kim; Michael Y Wang
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 4.047

5.  [Surgery of the intervertebral ligaments, alternative to arthrodesis in the treatment of degenerative instabilities].

Authors:  J Senegas
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 0.500

6.  Risk factors for lumbar disc degeneration: a 5-year prospective MRI study in asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  Achim Elfering; Norbert Semmer; Daniel Birkhofer; Marco Zanetti; Juerg Hodler; Norbert Boos
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Use of structural equation modeling to test the construct validity of the SF-36 Health Survey in ten countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment.

Authors:  S D Keller; J E Ware; P M Bentler; N K Aaronson; J Alonso; G Apolone; J B Bjorner; J Brazier; M Bullinger; S Kaasa; A Leplège; M Sullivan; B Gandek
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  The value of magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine to predict low-back pain in asymptomatic subjects : a seven-year follow-up study.

Authors:  D G Borenstein; J W O'Mara; S D Boden; W C Lauerman; A Jacobson; C Platenberg; D Schellinger; S W Wiesel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Are lumbar spine reoperation rates falling with greater use of fusion surgery and new surgical technology?

Authors:  Brook I Martin; Sohail K Mirza; Bryan A Comstock; Darryl T Gray; William Kreuter; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Stability of posterior spinal instrumentation and its effects on adjacent motion segments in the lumbosacral spine.

Authors:  Y Shono; K Kaneda; K Abumi; P C McAfee; B W Cunningham
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Role of lumbar interspinous distraction on the neural elements.

Authors:  Alex Alfieri; Roberto Gazzeri; Julian Prell; Christian Scheller; Jens Rachinger; Christian Strauss; Andreas Schwarz
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  [Results of the Wallis interspinous spacer].

Authors:  M Reith; M Richter
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of posterior lumbar dynamic stabilization: an in vitro comparison between Universal Clamp and Wallis systems.

Authors:  Brice Ilharreborde; Miranda N Shaw; Lawrence J Berglund; Kristin D Zhao; Ralph E Gay; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Aperius interspinous device for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a review.

Authors:  Ashwanth Ramesh; Frank Lyons; Michael Kelleher
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 5.  Effectiveness of interspinous implant surgery in patients with intermittent neurogenic claudication: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wouter A Moojen; Mark P Arts; Ronald H M A Bartels; Wilco C H Jacobs; Wilco C Peul
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Bone resorption during the first year after implantation of a single-segment dynamic interspinous stabilization device and its risk factors.

Authors:  Kaifeng Wang; Zhenqi Zhu; Bo Wang; Yi Zhu; Haiying Liu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  The cost effectiveness of dynamic and static interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis compared with laminectomy.

Authors:  Mohsen Yaghoubi; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Mohammad Moradi-Joo; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar; Neda Zamani; Ahmad Naghibzadeh-Tahami
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2016-03-06

8.  Radioisotopic assessment of bone metabolism of the operated vertebra after inter-process stabilizer implantation in the lumbar segment of the spine.

Authors:  Maciej Radek; Andrzej Radek; Jacek Rysz; Zbigniew Maziarz; Mariusz Gadzicki; Wiesław Tryniszewski
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.318

9.  Comparison of two FDA-approved interspinous spacers for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: Superion versus X-STOP-a meta-analysis from five randomized controlled trial studies.

Authors:  He Zhao; Li-Jun Duan; Yu-Shan Gao; Yong-Dong Yang; Ding-Yan Zhao; Xiang-Sheng Tang; Zhen-Guo Hu; Chuan-Hong Li; Si-Xue Chen; Tao Liu; Xing Yu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 10.  Controversies about interspinous process devices in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Roberto Gazzeri; Marcelo Galarza; Alex Alfieri
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.