Literature DB >> 11054180

The ethics of reusing archived tissue for research.

R Ashcroft1.   

Abstract

Pathologists have been establishing archives of human organs and tissue for research use for many years now. Controversy has arisen recently over these collections, particularly with regard to the right of patients or relatives to consent to removal and retention of tissue, genetic research using stored tissue samples, and commercial exploitation of tissue collections and genetic material. This paper discusses the ethics of reusing existing archives of tissue. New archives are established under much more stringent conditions than in the past. What rules should apply to existing archives? Guidelines to regulate such use are useful, but face serious difficulties in balancing the variety of public and private interests relating to tissue banking. Consent cannot be obtained retrospectively, but public trust can be established by open acknowledgement of the evolution of ethical standards and strict adherence to current best practice. Guidelines and standards vary from country to country, but ethical principles should not. The implications of this view for pathologists worldwide are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11054180     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2990.2000.00276.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol        ISSN: 0305-1846            Impact factor:   8.090


  9 in total

1.  The privacy of Tutankhamen--utilising the genetic information in stored tissue samples.

Authors:  S Holm
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2001-09

2.  Stored human tissue: an ethical perspective on the fate of anonymous, archival material.

Authors:  D G Jones; R Gear; K A Galvin
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 3.  Ethical issues in molecular medicine of relevance to surgeons.

Authors:  Mark Bernstein; Joseph Bampoe; Abdallah S Daar
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Motivating donors to genetic research? Anthropological reasons to rethink the role of informed consent.

Authors:  Klaus Hoeyer; Niels Lynöe
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2006

Review 5.  Bodily rights and property rights.

Authors:  B Björkman; S O Hansson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Generating a taxonomy of regulatory responses to emerging issues in biomedicine.

Authors:  Wendy Lipworth
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.352

Review 7.  Different types--different rights. Distinguishing between different perspectives on ownership of biological material.

Authors:  Barbro Björkman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  A protocol for precise comparisons of small vessel disease lesions between ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology.

Authors:  Catherine A Humphreys; Maurits A Jansen; Susana Muñoz Maniega; Víctor González-Castro; Cyril Pernet; Ian J Deary; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Joanna M Wardlaw; Colin Smith
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 5.266

9.  Ethics of children's participation in a Saudi biobank: an exploratory survey.

Authors:  Ghiath Alahmad; Tamer Hifnawy; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 8.822

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.