Literature DB >> 17717734

Different types--different rights. Distinguishing between different perspectives on ownership of biological material.

Barbro Björkman1.   

Abstract

Drawing on a social construction theory of ownership in biological material this paper discusses which differences in biological material might motivate differences in treatment and ownership rights. The analysis covers both the perspective of the person from whom the material originates and that of the potential recipient. Seven components of bundles of rights, drawing on the analytical tradition of Tony Honoré, and their relationship to various types of biological material are investigated. To exemplify these categories the cases of a heart, a kidney, stem cells and hair are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17717734     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-007-9005-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  20 in total

1.  Genetics, commodification, and social justice in the globalization era.

Authors:  L S Cahill
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  2001-09

2.  Altruism and commerce: a defense of Titmuss against Arrow.

Authors:  Peter Singer
Journal:  Philos Public Aff       Date:  1973

3.  Morality and the market in blood.

Authors:  Robert M Stewart
Journal:  J Appl Philos       Date:  1984-10

4.  Biobanks. Population databases boom, from Iceland to the U.S.

Authors:  Jocelyn Kaiser
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-11-08       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  New creations?

Authors:  D Macer; R A Balk; B Freedman; M C Goulet
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.683

6.  Why we are not allowed to sell that which we are encouraged to donate.

Authors:  Barbro Björkman
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  An ethical market in human organs.

Authors:  Charles A Erin; John Harris
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Paying organ donors.

Authors:  J Harvey
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 9.  The ethics of reusing archived tissue for research.

Authors:  R Ashcroft
Journal:  Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 8.090

10.  Sperm and ova as property.

Authors:  R P Jansen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.903

View more
  1 in total

1.  "That's a good question": university researchers' views on ownership and retention of human genetic specimens.

Authors:  R Jean Cadigan; Michele M Easter; Allison W Dobson; Arlene M Davis; Barbra B Rothschild; Catherine Zimmer; Rene Sterling; Gail Henderson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 8.822

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.