Literature DB >> 16574874

Bodily rights and property rights.

B Björkman1, S O Hansson.   

Abstract

Whereas previous discussions on ownership of biological material have been much informed by the natural rights tradition, insufficient attention has been paid to the strand in liberal political theory represented by Felix Cohen, Tony Honoré, and others, which treats property relations as socially constructed bundles of rights. In accordance with that tradition, we propose that the primary normative issue is what combination of rights a person should have to a particular item of biological material. Whether that bundle qualifies to be called "property" or "ownership" is a secondary, terminological issue. We suggest five principles of bodily rights and show how they can be applied to the construction of ethically appropriate bundles of rights to biological material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16574874      PMCID: PMC2565785          DOI: 10.1136/jme.2004.011270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  21 in total

1.  Genetics, commodification, and social justice in the globalization era.

Authors:  L S Cahill
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  2001-09

2.  Altruism and commerce: a defense of Titmuss against Arrow.

Authors:  Peter Singer
Journal:  Philos Public Aff       Date:  1973

3.  Splitting embryos on the slippery slope: ethics and public policy.

Authors:  Ruth Macklin
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  1994-09

4.  The morality of a free market for transplant organs.

Authors:  Mark T Nelson
Journal:  Public Aff Q       Date:  1991-01

5.  Morality and the market in blood.

Authors:  Robert M Stewart
Journal:  J Appl Philos       Date:  1984-10

6.  Biobanks. Population databases boom, from Iceland to the U.S.

Authors:  Jocelyn Kaiser
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-11-08       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Is a market in human organs necessarily exploitative?

Authors:  M J Cherry
Journal:  Public Aff Q       Date:  2000-10

Review 8.  The ethics of biobanks.

Authors:  Sven Ove Hansson
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 9.  The ethics of reusing archived tissue for research.

Authors:  R Ashcroft
Journal:  Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 8.090

Review 10.  Ownership of human tissue and the law.

Authors:  Loane Skene
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 53.242

View more
  12 in total

1.  Biobank governance: heterogeneous modes of ordering and democratization.

Authors:  Herbert Gottweis; Georg Lauss
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-12-07

2.  Property and the body: applying Honore.

Authors:  Muireann Quigley
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Neither property right nor heroic gift, neither sacrifice nor aporia: the benefit of the theoretical lens of sharing in donation ethics.

Authors:  Kristin Zeiler
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2014-05

Review 4.  Development and progress of Ireland's biobank network: Ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI), standardized documentation, sample and data release, and international perspective.

Authors:  Blanaid Mee; Eoin Gaffney; Sharon A Glynn; Simona Donatello; Paul Carroll; Elizabeth Connolly; Sarah Mc Garrigle; Terry Boyle; Delia Flannery; Francis J Sullivan; Paul McCormick; Mairead Griffin; Cian Muldoon; Joanna Fay; Tony O'Grady; Elaine Kay; Joe Eustace; Louise Burke; Asim A Sheikh; Stephen Finn; Richard Flavin; Francis J Giles
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Who Owns the Data in a Medical Information Commons?

Authors:  Amy L McGuire; Jessica Roberts; Sean Aas; Barbara J Evans
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.718

6.  "That's a good question": university researchers' views on ownership and retention of human genetic specimens.

Authors:  R Jean Cadigan; Michele M Easter; Allison W Dobson; Arlene M Davis; Barbra B Rothschild; Catherine Zimmer; Rene Sterling; Gail Henderson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Presuming consent in the ethics of posthumous sperm procurement and conception.

Authors:  Frederick Kroon
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2016-05-27

8.  Consenting options for posthumous organ donation: presumed consent and incentives are not favored.

Authors:  Muhammad M Hammami; Hunaida M Abdulhameed; Kristine A Concepcion; Abdullah Eissa; Sumaya Hammami; Hala Amer; Abdelraheem Ahmed; Eman Al-Gaai
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Consent for Biobanking: The Legal Frameworks of Countries in the BioSHaRE-EU Project.

Authors:  Jane Kaye; Linda Briceño Moraia; Liam Curren; Jessica Bell; Colin Mitchell; Sirpa Soini; Nils Hoppe; Morten Øien; Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 2.300

10.  Dual consent? Donors' and recipients' views about involvement in decision-making on the use of embryos created by gamete donation in research.

Authors:  I Baía; C de Freitas; C Samorinha; V Provoost; S Silva
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.