Literature DB >> 25086537

A new and fast image feature selection method for developing an optimal mammographic mass detection scheme.

Maxine Tan1, Jiantao Pu2, Bin Zheng3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Selecting optimal features from a large image feature pool remains a major challenge in developing computer-aided detection (CAD) schemes of medical images. The objective of this study is to investigate a new approach to significantly improve efficacy of image feature selection and classifier optimization in developing a CAD scheme of mammographic masses.
METHODS: An image dataset including 1600 regions of interest (ROIs) in which 800 are positive (depicting malignant masses) and 800 are negative (depicting CAD-generated false positive regions) was used in this study. After segmentation of each suspicious lesion by a multilayer topographic region growth algorithm, 271 features were computed in different feature categories including shape, texture, contrast, isodensity, spiculation, local topological features, as well as the features related to the presence and location of fat and calcifications. Besides computing features from the original images, the authors also computed new texture features from the dilated lesion segments. In order to select optimal features from this initial feature pool and build a highly performing classifier, the authors examined and compared four feature selection methods to optimize an artificial neural network (ANN) based classifier, namely: (1) Phased Searching with NEAT in a Time-Scaled Framework, (2) A sequential floating forward selection (SFFS) method, (3) A genetic algorithm (GA), and (4) A sequential forward selection (SFS) method. Performances of the four approaches were assessed using a tenfold cross validation method.
RESULTS: Among these four methods, SFFS has highest efficacy, which takes 3%-5% of computational time as compared to GA approach, and yields the highest performance level with the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.864 ± 0.034. The results also demonstrated that except using GA, including the new texture features computed from the dilated mass segments improved the AUC results of the ANNs optimized using other three feature selection methods. In addition, among 271 features, the shape, local morphological features, fat and calcification based features were the most frequently selected features to build ANNs.
CONCLUSIONS: Although conventional GA is a powerful tool in optimizing classifiers used in CAD schemes of medical images, it is very computationally intensive. This study demonstrated that using a new SFFS based approach enabled to significantly improve efficacy of image feature selection for developing CAD schemes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25086537      PMCID: PMC4105957          DOI: 10.1118/1.4890080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  55 in total

1.  Performance gain in computer-assisted detection schemes by averaging scores generated from artificial neural networks with adaptive filtering.

Authors:  B Zheng; Y H Chang; W F Good; D Gur
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Computer-aided detection schemes: the effect of limiting the number of cued regions in each case.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Joseph K Leader; Gordon Abrams; Betty Shindel; Victor Catullo; Walter F Good; David Gur
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Comparison of similarity measures for the task of template matching of masses on serial mammograms.

Authors:  Peter Filev; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Multiview-based computer-aided detection scheme for breast masses.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Joseph K Leader; Gordon S Abrams; Amy H Lu; Luisa P Wallace; Glenn S Maitz; David Gur
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Image feature selection by a genetic algorithm: application to classification of mass and normal breast tissue.

Authors:  B Sahiner; H P Chan; D Wei; N Petrick; M A Helvie; D D Adler; M M Goodsitt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Automated detection of breast masses on mammograms using adaptive contrast enhancement and texture classification.

Authors:  N Petrick; H P Chan; D Wei; B Sahiner; M A Helvie; D D Adler
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Correspondence in texture features between two mammographic views.

Authors:  Shalini Gupta; Mia K Markey
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis.

Authors:  N R Mudigonda; R M Rangayyan; J E Desautels
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Classifying mammographic lesions using computerized image analysis.

Authors:  J Kilday; F Palmieri; M D Fox
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Assessment of performance improvement in content-based medical image retrieval schemes using fractal dimension.

Authors:  Sang Cheol Park; Xiao-Hui Wang; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 3.173

View more
  4 in total

1.  A new approach to develop computer-aided detection schemes of digital mammograms.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Wei Qian; Jiantao Pu; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  A new approach to develop computer-aided diagnosis scheme of breast mass classification using deep learning technology.

Authors:  Yuchen Qiu; Shiju Yan; Rohith Reddy Gundreddy; Yunzhi Wang; Samuel Cheng; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.535

3.  Computer-aided breast MR image feature analysis for prediction of tumor response to chemotherapy.

Authors:  Faranak Aghaei; Maxine Tan; Alan B Hollingsworth; Wei Qian; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Prediction of chemotherapy response in ovarian cancer patients using a new clustered quantitative image marker.

Authors:  Abolfazl Zargari; Yue Du; Morteza Heidari; Theresa C Thai; Camille C Gunderson; Kathleen Moore; Robert S Mannel; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng; Yuchen Qiu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.609

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.