Literature DB >> 30367322

Classification of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) images.

Shaked Perek1, Nahum Kiryati2, Gali Zimmerman-Moreno3, Miri Sklair-Levy3, Eli Konen3, Arnaldo Mayer3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) is a recently developed breast imaging technique. CESM relies on dual-energy acquisition following contrast agent injection to improve mammography sensitivity. CESM is comparable to contrast-enhanced MRI in terms of sensitivity, at a fraction of the cost. However, since lesion variability is large, even with the improved visibility provided by CESM, differentiation between benign and malignant enhancement is not accurate and a biopsy is usually performed for final assessment. Breast biopsies can be stressful to the patient and are expensive to healthcare systems. Moreover, as the biopsies results are most of the time benign, a specificity improvement in the radiologist diagnosis is required. This work presents a deep learning-based decision support system, which aims at improving the specificity of breast cancer diagnosis by CESM without affecting sensitivity.
METHODS: We compare two analysis approaches, fine-tuning a pretrained network and fully training a convolutional neural network, for classification of CESM breast mass as benign or malignant. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (BIRADS) is a radiological lexicon, used with breast images, to categorize lesions. We improve each classification network by incorporating BIRADS textual features as an additional input to the network. We evaluate two ways of BIRADS fusion as network input: feature fusion and decision fusion. This leads to multimodal network architectures. At classification, we also exploit information from apparently normal breast tissue in the CESM of the considered patient, leading to a patient-specific classification.
RESULTS: We evaluate performance using fivefold cross-validation, on 129 randomly selected breast lesions annotated by an experienced radiologist. Each annotation includes a contour of the mass in the image, biopsy-proven label of benign or malignant lesion and BIRADS descriptors. At 100% sensitivity, specificity of 66% was achieved using a multimodal network, which combines inputs at feature level and patient-specific classification.
CONCLUSIONS: The presented multimodal network may significantly reduce benign biopsies, without compromising sensitivity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Computer vision; Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM); Deep learning; Multimodal neural networks

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30367322     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-018-1876-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  14 in total

Review 1.  Contrast enhanced mammography: techniques, current results, and potential indications.

Authors:  M B I Lobbes; M L Smidt; J Houwers; V C Tjan-Heijnen; J E Wildberger
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Convolutional Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: Full Training or Fine Tuning?

Authors:  Nima Tajbakhsh; Jae Y Shin; Suryakanth R Gurudu; R Todd Hurst; Christopher B Kendall; Michael B Gotway
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Deep Dynamic Neural Networks for Multimodal Gesture Segmentation and Recognition.

Authors:  Di Wu; Lionel Pigou; Pieter-Jan Kindermans; Nam Do-Hoang Le; Ling Shao; Joni Dambre; Jean-Marc Odobez
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 6.226

4.  An automatic method to discriminate malignant masses from normal tissue in digital mammograms.

Authors:  G M te Brake; N Karssemeijer; J H Hendriks
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI: Initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size.

Authors:  E M Fallenberg; C Dromain; F Diekmann; F Engelken; M Krohn; J M Singh; B Ingold-Heppner; K J Winzer; U Bick; D M Renz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Computer-aided detection/diagnosis of breast cancer in mammography and ultrasound: a review.

Authors:  Afsaneh Jalalian; Syamsiah B T Mashohor; Hajjah Rozi Mahmud; M Iqbal B Saripan; Abdul Rahman B Ramli; Babak Karasfi
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 1.605

7.  Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) versus breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): A retrospective comparison in 66 breast lesions.

Authors:  L Li; R Roth; P Germaine; S Ren; M Lee; K Hunter; E Tinney; L Liao
Journal:  Diagn Interv Imaging       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.026

8.  Application of BI-RADS Descriptors in Contrast-Enhanced Dual-Energy Mammography: Comparison with MRI.

Authors:  Thomas Knogler; Peter Homolka; Mathias Hoernig; Robert Leithner; Georg Langs; Martin Waitzbauer; Katja Pinker; Sabine Leitner; Thomas H Helbich
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: comparison with conventional mammography and histopathology in 152 women.

Authors:  Elzbieta Luczyńska; Sylwia Heinze-Paluchowska; Sonia Dyczek; Pawel Blecharz; Janusz Rys; Marian Reinfuss
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Medical Image Retrieval: A Multimodal Approach.

Authors:  Yu Cao; Shawn Steffey; Jianbiao He; Degui Xiao; Cui Tao; Ping Chen; Henning Müller
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2015-07-22
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  CAD and AI for breast cancer-recent development and challenges.

Authors:  Heang-Ping Chan; Ravi K Samala; Lubomir M Hadjiiski
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Incorporating the clinical and radiomics features of contrast-enhanced mammography to classify breast lesions: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Simin Wang; Yuqi Sun; Ning Mao; Shaofeng Duan; Qin Li; Ruimin Li; Tingting Jiang; Zhongyi Wang; Haizhu Xie; Yajia Gu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-10

Review 3.  Transfer learning for medical image classification: a literature review.

Authors:  Mate E Maros; Thomas Ganslandt; Hee E Kim; Alejandro Cosa-Linan; Nandhini Santhanam; Mahboubeh Jannesari
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 1.930

4.  Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography without and with a delayed image for diagnosing malignancy among mass lesions in dense breast.

Authors:  Akmaral Serikovna Ainakulova; Zhamilya Zholdybay Zholdybay; Dilyara Radikovna Kaidarova; Natalya Igorevna Inozemtceva; Madina Orazaykyzy Gabdullina; Zhanar Kabdualievna Zhakenova; Alexandra Sergeevna Panina; Dias Kairatovich Toleshbayev; Jandos Mukhtarovich Amankulov
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2021-04-06

5.  Deep learning analysis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography to determine histoprognostic factors of malignant breast tumours.

Authors:  Caroline Dominique; Françoise Callonnec; Anca Berghian; Diana Defta; Pierre Vera; Romain Modzelewski; Pierre Decazes
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 7.034

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.